Robertson L T
Department of Biological Structure and Function, Oregon Health Science University, School of Dentistry, Portland 97201, USA.
J Dent Educ. 1996 Dec;60(12):969-77.
A survey of fifty-one of the fifty-three dental schools in the continental United States provided information about pharmacology curriculum content and time allocation. Most dental schools offer a traditional didactic course in basic pharmacology, with about 50 percent of the medical school-based (MSB) and 75 percent of the dental school-based (DSB) programs providing additional pharmacology material in other basic and clinical courses. The four combined medical-dental (M-D) student courses have more hours of instruction, clinical conferences and reviews, and number of instructors than either the dental school- or medical school-based courses. DSB and MSB pharmacology courses were similar in most regards, with a relatively low compliance with the current curriculum guidelines. The DSB and MSB courses provided more time for neuropharmacology and less time for agents related to various organ systems than the M-D courses. There is considerable potential to improve pharmacology instruction by expanding the inclusion of pharmacology in other courses, increasing the number of clinical conferences and discussions, and offering problem-based-learning sessions.
对美国本土53所牙科学院中的51所进行的一项调查,提供了有关药理学课程内容和时间分配的信息。大多数牙科学院提供传统的基础药理学理论课程,约50%以医学院为基础(MSB)的课程和75%以牙科学院为基础(DSB)的课程在其他基础和临床课程中提供额外的药理学材料。四门医学与牙科学联合(M-D)学生课程比以牙科学院或医学院为基础的课程有更多的授课时间、临床研讨会和复习时间,以及更多的教师。DSB和MSB药理学课程在大多数方面相似,对当前课程指南的遵循程度相对较低。与M-D课程相比,DSB和MSB课程为神经药理学提供了更多时间,而为与各种器官系统相关的药物提供的时间更少。通过扩大药理学在其他课程中的纳入、增加临床研讨会和讨论的数量以及提供基于问题的学习课程,改善药理学教学有很大潜力。