• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进消费者选择的指南。

A guide to facilitating consumer choice.

作者信息

Hoy E W, Wicks E K, Forland R A

机构信息

Institute for Health Policy Solutions, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 1996 Winter;15(4):9-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.4.9.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.15.4.9
PMID:8991251
Abstract

Some purchasers and policymakers are advocating models that offer consumers a choice of health plans as a way to help them choose a plan that best meets their needs and to create incentives for health plans to compete on the basis of efficiency, quality, and service. A review of six consumer-choice models indicates that these objectives can be met if purchasers (1) create a level field for comparison through standardized benefits and structured enrollment processes; (2) offer a limited number of plans that meet appropriate selection criteria; (3) provide comprehensive, objective, and reliable consumer information; (4) support the process with education; and (5) hold plans accountable through uniform reporting of performance data.

摘要

一些购买者和政策制定者正在倡导为消费者提供健康计划选择的模式,以此帮助他们选择最符合自身需求的计划,并促使健康计划在效率、质量和服务的基础上展开竞争。对六种消费者选择模式进行的一项审查表明,如果购买者能够做到以下几点,这些目标是可以实现的:(1) 通过标准化福利和结构化参保流程创造公平的比较环境;(2) 提供数量有限且符合适当选择标准的计划;(3) 提供全面、客观且可靠的消费者信息;(4) 通过教育来支持这一过程;(5) 通过统一报告绩效数据来让各计划承担责任。

相似文献

1
A guide to facilitating consumer choice.促进消费者选择的指南。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1996 Winter;15(4):9-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.4.9.
2
Awakening consumer stewardship of health benefits: prevalence and differentiation of new health plan models.唤醒消费者对健康福利的管理意识:新型健康保险计划模式的普及与差异
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 2):1055-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00273.x.
3
Clinical care with a retail flavor: Twin Cities employer group tries a bold new experiment.
Healthc Forum J. 1997 Jul-Aug;40(4):17, 26-9.
4
Early experience with employee choice of consumer-directed health plans and satisfaction with enrollment.员工选择消费者导向型健康计划的早期体验及对参保的满意度。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 2):1141-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00279.x.
5
Multiple choice health insurance: the lessons and challenge to employers.
Inquiry. 1990 Winter;27(4):368-73.
6
Renewed emphasis on consumer cost sharing in health insurance benefit design.医疗保险福利设计中对消费者成本分担的再度重视。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W139-54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w2.139.
7
HEDIS 3.0 advances health plan accountability.医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)3.0提升了健康计划的问责制。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1997 May;51(5):48, 50, 52.
8
The quest for value in health care.
J Health Care Finance. 1996 Spring;22(3):52-61.
9
Empowered patients buy more efficient care ... roundtable of experts.有主见的患者会购买更高效的医疗服务……专家圆桌会议。
Bus Health. 1996 Jun;14(6):35, 38-40, 42.
10
Confused consumers. When given options, what health plans do consumers choose--and why?
Hosp Health Netw. 1993 Jul 5;67(13):31-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Public views on healthcare performance indicators and patient choice.公众对医疗保健绩效指标和患者选择的看法。
J R Soc Med. 2003 Jul;96(7):338-42. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.96.7.338.
2
Insurance benefit preferences of the low-income uninsured.低收入未参保者的保险福利偏好
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Feb;17(2):125-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10609.x.