Suppr超能文献

患者对心理治疗联盟的看法:三种联盟测量方法的探索性因素分析

Patients' view of the alliance of psychotherapy: exploratory factor analysis of three alliance measures.

作者信息

Hatcher R L, Barends A W

机构信息

Psychological Clinic, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1109, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Dec;64(6):1326-36. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.6.1326.

Abstract

Extending a previous study (R.L. Hatcher, A. Barends, J. Hansell, & M.J. Gutfreund, 1995), factor analysis of 3 alliance measures completed by 231 patients explored patients' views of the alliance. Two of 6 factors, Confident Collaboration and Idealized Relationship (with the substantial general factor removed), correlated with patients' estimate of improvement (rs = .37 and -.23, respectively; p < .001). Patients view the core of the alliance as a purposive mutual collaboration, or working alliance; patients who acknowledge some hostility do better in therapy. Three other factors--Goals and Tasks, Bond, and Dedicated Patient--resemble established subscales but are unrelated to improvement beyond the general factor. Factor 6 assesses improvement rather than alliance. The collaborative working alliance should be given prominence in alliance theory and measurement.

摘要

在之前一项研究(R.L. 哈彻、A. 巴伦兹、J. 汉塞尔和M.J. 古特弗伦德,1995年)的基础上进行拓展,对231名患者完成的3种联盟测量方法进行因素分析,以探究患者对联盟的看法。6个因素中的2个,即自信协作和理想化关系(去除了实质性的一般因素),与患者对改善情况的估计相关(相关系数分别为0.37和 -0.23;p < 0.001)。患者将联盟的核心视为有目的的相互协作,即工作联盟;承认存在一些敌意的患者在治疗中表现更好。另外3个因素——目标与任务、纽带和专注患者——类似于已有的分量表,但除一般因素外与改善情况无关。因素6评估的是改善情况而非联盟。协作性工作联盟在联盟理论和测量中应得到重视。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验