Laubichler W, Kühberger A, Sedlmeier P
Institut für Gerichtliche Medizin, Universität Salzburg.
Nervenarzt. 1996 Sep;67(9):774-80. doi: 10.1007/s001150050052.
We analyzed psychiatric and criminological data from 103 arsonists. The following criticisms of the definition of pyromania according to DSM-III-R and IDC-10 seem appropriate. First, the categoric exclusion of aggressive motives does not seem very promising, since approximately one fourth of arsonists whose firesetting is based on motives quoted in DSM-III-R may also have an aggressive motive. Second, ICD-10 gives being drunk and alcoholism as a criterion for the exclusion of pyromania. This seems untenable, since the behavior classed as pyromania is largely a product of alcohol misuse. Repeated firesetting, resulting from being fascinated by fire etc., may be less a disturbance of impulse control but rather the manifestation of a psychoinfantilism, which, supported by alcohol abuse, extends into older age. The mean age of such arsonists is slightly above 20 years. The tendency for relapses after imprisonment seems to be low; this tendency probably decreases spontaneously in older age. The mean age of arsonists with aggressive motives is a little below 30 years, those setting fire with suicidal motives have a mean age of 35, deluded arsonists have a mean age of 40 years. Concrete sexual motives are relatively rare. Approximately 50% of arsonists have a purely aggressive motive. Retaliation is a rare cause, however, since most of them do not even know the victims. One third of these persons set the fire in their own homes. Most arsonists show a personality disorder, with insecurity and narcissism predominating. Data on firesetting are to be treated with caution, since two thirds of all cases are newer resolved; one fourth of cases concern minors, and in Central Europe arsonists with rational motives are hardly ever referred to psychiatrists.
我们分析了103名纵火犯的精神病学和犯罪学数据。以下针对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)及《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)中纵火癖定义的批评似乎是合理的。首先,将攻击动机完全排除在外似乎不太可行,因为在那些基于DSM-III-R中所列举动机纵火的纵火犯中,约有四分之一可能同时也存在攻击动机。其次,ICD-10将醉酒和酗酒作为排除纵火癖的一个标准。这似乎站不住脚,因为被归类为纵火癖的行为很大程度上是酒精滥用的产物。因对火着迷等原因导致的反复纵火,可能与其说是冲动控制障碍,不如说是一种心理幼稚病的表现,这种心理幼稚病在酒精滥用的助推下,持续到了成年期。这类纵火犯的平均年龄略高于20岁。入狱后复发的倾向似乎较低;这种倾向可能会随着年龄增长而自发降低。有攻击动机的纵火犯平均年龄略低于30岁,有自杀动机的纵火犯平均年龄为35岁,妄想型纵火犯平均年龄为40岁。具体的性动机相对较少见。大约50%的纵火犯有纯粹的攻击动机。报复是一个罕见的原因,因为他们中的大多数甚至都不认识受害者。这些人中三分之一在自己家中纵火。大多数纵火犯表现出人格障碍,以不安全感和自恋为主。关于纵火的数据应谨慎对待,因为所有案件中有三分之二尚未得到解决;四分之一的案件涉及未成年人,而且在中欧,有理性动机的纵火犯很少被转介给精神科医生。