• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人体器官买卖:自主性悖论。

Marketing human organs: the autonomy paradox.

作者信息

Marshall P A, Thomasma D C, Daar A S

机构信息

Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60153, USA.

出版信息

Theor Med. 1996 Mar;17(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/BF00489737.

DOI:10.1007/BF00489737
PMID:8992643
Abstract

The severe shortage of organs for transplantation and the continual reluctance of the public to voluntarily donate has prompted consideration of alternative strategies for organ procurement. This paper explores the development of market approaches for procuring human organs for transplantation and considers the social and moral implications of organ donation as both a "gift of life" and a "commodity exchange." The problematic and paradoxical articulation of individual autonomy in relation to property rights and marketing human body parts is addressed. We argue that beliefs about proprietorship over human body parts and the capacity to provide consent for organ donation are culturally constructed. We contend that the political and economic framework of biomedicine, in western and non-western nations, influences access to transplantation technology and shapes the form and development of specific market approaches. Finally, we suggest that marketing approaches for organ procurement are and will be negotiated within cultural parameters constrained by several factors: beliefs about the physical body and personhood, religious traditions, economic conditions, and the availability of technological resources.

摘要

移植器官的严重短缺以及公众持续不愿自愿捐赠,促使人们考虑器官获取的替代策略。本文探讨了为移植获取人体器官的市场方法的发展,并考虑了器官捐赠作为“生命的礼物”和“商品交换”的社会及道德含义。文中还探讨了个人自主权在财产权和人体器官营销方面存在的问题及矛盾表述。我们认为,关于人体器官所有权以及器官捐赠同意能力的观念是文化建构的。我们主张,西方和非西方国家生物医学的政治和经济框架会影响移植技术的可及性,并塑造特定市场方法的形式和发展。最后,我们指出,器官获取的营销方法过去是、将来也会在由多种因素限制的文化参数范围内进行协商:关于身体和人格的观念、宗教传统、经济状况以及技术资源的可获得性。

相似文献

1
Marketing human organs: the autonomy paradox.人体器官买卖:自主性悖论。
Theor Med. 1996 Mar;17(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/BF00489737.
2
Organ wars: the battle for body parts.器官大战:争夺人体器官的战斗。
Med Anthropol Q. 1995 Sep;9(3):335-56. doi: 10.1525/maq.1995.9.3.02a00040.
3
The notion of gift-giving and organ donation.送礼与器官捐赠的概念。
Bioethics. 1994 Apr;8(2):127-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1994.tb00250.x.
4
Ethical criteria for procuring and distributing organs for transplantation.获取和分配用于移植的器官的伦理标准。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1989 Spring;14(1):87-113. doi: 10.1215/03616878-14-1-87.
5
Brain death and organ transplantation: cultural bases of medical technology.脑死亡与器官移植:医学技术的文化基础
Curr Anthropol. 1994 Jun;35(3):233-54. doi: 10.1086/204269.
6
The ethics of organ donation.器官捐赠的伦理问题。
Br Med Bull. 1997;53(4):921-39. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011659.
7
Body futures: the case against marketing human organs.身体期货:反对人体器官交易的案例。
Health Prog. 1987 Jun;68(5):51-5.
8
An uneasy case against property rights in body parts.一个关于人体器官产权的棘手案例。
Soc Philos Policy. 1994 Summer;11(2):259-86. doi: 10.1017/s0265052500004519.
9
The give and take of organ procurement.器官获取中的相互让步。
J Med Philos. 1994 Feb;19(1):61-78. doi: 10.1093/jmp/19.1.61.
10
Financial incentives for organ procurement. Ethical aspects of future contracts for cadaveric donors. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association.器官获取的经济激励措施。尸体捐赠者未来合同的伦理问题。美国医学协会伦理与司法事务委员会。
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Mar 27;155(6):581-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.155.6.581.

引用本文的文献

1
How a compensated kidney donation program facilitates the sale of human organs in a regulated market: the implications of Islam on organ donation and sale.有偿肾脏捐赠计划如何在规范的市场中促进人体器官买卖:伊斯兰教对器官捐赠和买卖的影响。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2022 Jul 28;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13010-022-00122-4.
2
Ethical issues regarding related and nonrelated living organ donors.关于亲属及非亲属活体器官捐赠者的伦理问题。
World J Surg. 2014 Jul;38(7):1658-63. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2549-4.
3
The paradox of health care.医疗保健的悖论。

本文引用的文献

1
Brain death and organ transplantation: cultural bases of medical technology.脑死亡与器官移植:医学技术的文化基础
Curr Anthropol. 1994 Jun;35(3):233-54. doi: 10.1086/204269.
2
Market and non-market mechanisms for procuring human and cadaveric organs: when the price is right.获取人体器官和尸体器官的市场与非市场机制:价格合适时。
Med Law Int. 1993;1(1):17-32. doi: 10.1177/096853329300100103.
3
Increasing the supply of transplant organs: the virtues of a futures market.增加移植器官的供应:期货市场的优点。
Health Care Anal. 2001;9(4):369-86. doi: 10.1023/A:1013854030699.
4
Paid organ donation--the grey basket concept.有偿器官捐赠——灰色篮子概念。
J Med Ethics. 1998 Dec;24(6):365-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.6.365.
George Washington Law Rev. 1989 Nov;58(1):1-51.
4
The meaning of "The economics and ethics of alternative cadaveric organ procurement policies.替代性尸体器官获取政策的经济学与伦理学意义
Yale J Regul. 1991 Summer;8(2):453-62.
5
The use of financial incentives in medical care: the case of commerce in transplantable organs.医疗保健中经济激励措施的使用:可移植器官交易的案例。
Health Matrix Clevel. 1993 Spring;3(1):1-30.
6
Organ transplantation (re)examined?器官移植(重新)审视?
Med Anthropol Q. 1995 Sep;9(3):393-7; discussion 398-9. doi: 10.1525/maq.1995.9.3.02a00070.
7
Transcending mortality: organ transplants and the practice of contradictions.超越死亡:器官移植与矛盾的实践
Med Anthropol Q. 1995 Sep;9(3):390-3; discussion 398-9. doi: 10.1525/maq.1995.9.3.02a00060.
8
Organ transplantation as a transformative experience: anthropological insights into the restructuring of the self.器官移植作为一种变革性经历:关于自我重构的人类学见解。
Med Anthropol Q. 1995 Sep;9(3):357-89. doi: 10.1525/maq.1995.9.3.02a00050.
9
Organ wars: the battle for body parts.器官大战:争夺人体器官的战斗。
Med Anthropol Q. 1995 Sep;9(3):335-56. doi: 10.1525/maq.1995.9.3.02a00040.
10
Negative impact of trading in human organs on the development of transplantation in the Middle East.
Transplant Proc. 1993 Jun;25(3):2310-3.