Biedler A, Wilhelm W, Grüness V, Kleinschmidt S, Berg K, Mertzlufft F
Klinik für Anaesthesiologie und Intensivmedizin der Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar.
Anaesthesist. 1996 Oct;45(10):957-64. doi: 10.1007/s001010050330.
Capnometry, the noninvasive measurement of end-expiratory CO2 concentration (cCO2, vol%) or calculation of its respective partial pressure (pCO2; mmHg) is an established method. However, for prehospital settings, capnometry is still used very restrictively, mainly owing to the respective devices used. The prerequisite for their use is sufficient accuracy (+/-2 mmHg) and easy handling. Two special capnometers (STAT CAP. Nellcor: mainstream, semiquantitative estimation; Capnocheck 8200, BCI: sidestream, quantitative measurement, numeric display), developed recently for potential use in emergency medicine, are said to fit these criteria. Therefore, the objective of the present investigation was to assess the accuracy and precision of both devices, comparing methods under standardized in vitro (reference gases) and in vivo (intubated and ventilated patients) conditions.
Both devices ("STAT CAP": pCO2 range, light bars; "Capnocheck 8200") were evaluated regarding the accuracy of pCO2 (Capnocheck) and the precision of the CO2 range (STAT CAP). Tests were performed with four dry gas mixtures (STPD) of defined composition and during ventilation of 20 intubated patients (BTPS). All measurements were compared with the alveolar gas monitor "AGM 1304" (Brüel & Kjaer, Denmark) as a reference method with a proven +/- 1 mmHg accuracy of pCO2 measurement.
The "Capnocheck" (BCI) presented an accuracy of the pregiven pCO2 of 0.7-1.4 mmHg (dry gas mixtures, STPD) and an overestimation of 0.2 +/- 4.1 mmHg (BTPS) during ventilation with pure oxygen; inaccuracy during ventilation with 70% N2O in O2 proved to be + 1.2 +/- 1.7 mmHg (BTPS). Nellcor's "STAT CAP" failed to reach the target value in 10% of analyses, as shown by the respective segment bar of the display.
Evaluation of the accuracy of capnometers must focus on the necessary pH2O correction and the possible effects exercised by O2 (and N2O) as well as the possible dependence on barometric pressure (if pCO2, mmHg, is the desired value). The "Capnocheck" showed an accuracy of more than 2 mmHg in dry gas mixtures as well as in humidified air. Concerning the practical use during constant artificial ventilation, the digital display and accuracy of the sidestream capnometer allow for reliable conclusions on patients' ventilation and circulation (CO2 elimination). The 90% accuracy of the segment bar display of Nellcor's "STAT CAP", per se covering only a rather broad range of 20 mmHg, obviously does not provide more than a rough overview. Therefore, the STAT CAP cannot be recommended for prehospital capnometry in the field. However, both the accuracy of the BCI capnometer (Capnocheck) and its numeric display and easy handling strongly recommend this device also for clinical use.
二氧化碳监测法,即对呼气末二氧化碳浓度(cCO2,体积%)进行无创测量或计算其相应分压(pCO2;mmHg),是一种既定方法。然而,在院前环境中,二氧化碳监测法的使用仍然非常有限,主要是由于所使用的相关设备。其使用的前提条件是足够的准确性(±2 mmHg)和易于操作。最近开发的两种特殊二氧化碳监测仪(STAT CAP,Nellcor:主流,半定量估计;Capnocheck 8200,BCI:旁流,定量测量,数字显示)据说符合这些标准。因此,本研究的目的是评估这两种设备的准确性和精密度,在标准化的体外(参考气体)和体内(插管和通气患者)条件下比较方法。
评估这两种设备(“STAT CAP”:pCO2范围,光柱显示;“Capnocheck 8200”)的pCO2准确性(Capnocheck)和CO2范围的精密度(STAT CAP)。使用四种定义成分的干燥气体混合物(标准温度和压力干燥)进行测试,并在20名插管患者通气期间(体温、环境压力、饱和水蒸气)进行测试。所有测量均与肺泡气体监测仪“AGM 1304”(丹麦Brüel & Kjaer公司)进行比较,作为参考方法,其pCO2测量的准确性已证明为±1 mmHg。
“Capnocheck”(BCI)在给定pCO2方面的准确性为0.7 - 1.4 mmHg(干燥气体混合物,标准温度和压力干燥),在纯氧通气期间高估0.2 ± 4.1 mmHg(体温、环境压力、饱和水蒸气);在70%氧化亚氮在氧气中通气期间的误差为 + 1.2 ± 1.7 mmHg(体温、环境压力、饱和水蒸气)。如显示屏的相应分段条所示,Nellcor的“STAT CAP”在10%的分析中未达到目标值。
对二氧化碳监测仪准确性的评估必须关注必要的水汽校正以及氧气(和氧化亚氮)可能产生的影响,以及可能对大气压力的依赖性(如果需要的是pCO2,mmHg)。“Capnocheck在干燥气体混合物以及潮湿空气中显示出超过2 mmHg的准确性。关于在持续人工通气期间的实际应用,旁流二氧化碳监测仪的数字显示和准确性允许对患者的通气和循环(二氧化碳消除)得出可靠结论。Nellcor的“STAT CAP”分段条显示的90%准确性,本身仅涵盖相当宽的20 mmHg范围,显然只能提供一个大致的概述。因此,不推荐在现场院前二氧化碳监测中使用STAT CAP。然而,BCI二氧化碳监测仪(Capnocheck)的准确性及其数字显示和易于操作强烈推荐该设备也用于临床。