• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测试指征曲线。

Test-indication curves.

作者信息

Bernstein J

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1997 Jan-Mar;17(1):103-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9701700112.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X9701700112
PMID:8994157
Abstract

Test-indication curves (TICs) are tools for determining whether a test is indicated for a given patient. They apply the threshold approach of Pauker and Kassirer in graphic form. These curves are composed of two parts: the raw curve, which plots posttest probability versus pretest probability (given values for specificity and sensitivity); and the final curve, in which three straight lines are added to the raw curve by the clinician to generate a TIC for a given treatment threshold. In the final curve, the complete range of pretest probability is segregated into three zones, corresponding to the three groups described by Pauker and Kassirer: those patients in whom disease is assumed to be present and who are thus best treated empirically; at the other extreme, those who require neither testing nor treatment; and, finally, those in the middle, for whom the test is indicated, since the decision to treat would be based on the test result. Thus the clinician could consult the TIC and determine with certainty whether the test should be employed for a given patient. It also could be modified with ease for a different patient, with a different set of threshold values. TICs provide a complete, visual interpretation of a test's diagnostic power, in the context of a given treatment threshold. They foster an intuitive comprehension of Pauker and Kassirer's method, and offer the clinician a facile means to prove that a test is indicated in a given setting. By promoting the use of exactly those tests that are indicated, TICs can help spare the patient the cost, burden, and risk of unnecessary testing, and help spare the physician the cost, burden, and risk of interpreting inconclusive test results.

摘要

试验指征曲线(TICs)是用于确定某项检测是否适用于特定患者的工具。它们以图形形式应用了帕克(Pauker)和卡西勒(Kassirer)的阈值方法。这些曲线由两部分组成:原始曲线,其绘制了检测后概率与检测前概率(给定特异性和敏感性值);以及最终曲线,临床医生在原始曲线上添加三条直线以生成针对给定治疗阈值的TIC。在最终曲线中,检测前概率的整个范围被划分为三个区域,对应于帕克和卡西勒所描述的三组患者:那些被假定患有疾病且因此最好接受经验性治疗的患者;在另一个极端,那些既不需要检测也不需要治疗的患者;最后,处于中间的那些患者,检测对他们是适用的,因为治疗决策将基于检测结果。因此,临床医生可以参考TIC并确定是否应对特定患者进行检测。它也可以轻松地针对不同患者、不同阈值集进行修改。TIC在给定治疗阈值的背景下,对检测的诊断能力提供了完整的可视化解释。它们促进了对帕克和卡西勒方法的直观理解,并为临床医生提供了一种简便的方法来证明在给定情况下某项检测是适用的。通过促进恰当地使用那些适用的检测,TIC可以帮助患者避免不必要检测的费用、负担和风险,并帮助医生避免解读不确定检测结果的费用、负担和风险。

相似文献

1
Test-indication curves.测试指征曲线。
Med Decis Making. 1997 Jan-Mar;17(1):103-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9701700112.
2
Using evidence to determine diagnostic test efficacy.运用证据确定诊断试验的效能。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2009;6(2):87-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2009.00148.x. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
3
A principled approach to setting optimal diagnostic thresholds: where ROC and indifference curves meet.一种设定最佳诊断阈值的原则性方法:ROC 曲线和无差异曲线的交汇点。
Eur J Intern Med. 2011 Jun;22(3):230-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2010.12.012. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
4
The economics of diagnosis.
Health Econ. 2006 Oct;15(10):1109-20. doi: 10.1002/hec.1114.
5
A Bayesian approach to toxicological testing.贝叶斯方法在毒理学测试中的应用。
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2020 Sep;105:106898. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2020.106898. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
6
Predictive value and efficiency of hematology data.血液学数据的预测价值与效率
Blood Cells. 1980;6(2):185-97.
7
Diagnostic testing, pre- and post-test probabilities, and their use in clinical practice.诊断测试、测试前和测试后的概率及其在临床实践中的应用。
Rev Port Cardiol. 2004 Sep;23(9):1187-98.
8
An enhancement of ROC curves made them clinically relevant for diagnostic-test comparison and optimal-threshold determination.ROC曲线的增强使其在临床诊断测试比较和最佳阈值确定方面具有相关性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jul;68(7):752-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
9
Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.慢性下腰痛手术治疗中的决策:用于选择腰椎融合术患者的预后测试的效能
Acta Orthop Suppl. 2013 Feb;84(349):1-35. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.753565.
10
The evaluation of diagnostic tests: evidence on technical and diagnostic accuracy, impact on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness is needed.需要对诊断测试进行评估:了解其技术和诊断准确性、对患者预后的影响以及成本效益方面的证据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;60(11):1116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.015. Epub 2007 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Describing the Diagnostic Accuracy of History, Physical Examination, Imaging, and Lumbar Puncture With an Exploration of Test Thresholds.自发性蛛网膜下腔出血:一项系统评价和荟萃分析,描述病史、体格检查、影像学检查及腰椎穿刺的诊断准确性并探索检查阈值
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;23(9):963-1003. doi: 10.1111/acem.12984. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
2
An Approach to Improve the Negative Predictive Value and Clinical Utility of Transthoracic Echocardiography in Suspected Native Valve Infective Endocarditis.提高经胸超声心动图对疑似自体瓣膜感染性心内膜炎的阴性预测值及临床应用价值的方法
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 Apr;29(4):315-22. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.12.009. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
3
How much diagnostic safety can we afford, and how should we decide? A health economics perspective.我们能够承受多少诊断安全性,又该如何做出决策?卫生经济学视角。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii11-ii20. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001616.