Easterling K W, Holtzman S G
Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1997 Jan;21(1):55-65. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(95)00065-8.
Traditional ICSS methodologies have attempted to evaluate changes in the rewarding value of brain stimulation by assessing the lowest value of the stimulation that will support responding. However, orderly changes in suprathreshold indicants of hedonic magnitude such as titration point have been shown. In the present experiments, rats were trained to respond on two ICSS autotitration schedules in which every response on one lever produced stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle, and every Xth response decreased either the stimulation current or the stimulation frequency. At any time, a response on a second "reset" lever restored the stimulation current or frequency available on the stimulation lever to its starting level and operationally defined changes in "reward value". In order to study this titration point measure, two response requirements (responses/stepdown; step size) and two stimulation parameters (initial stimulation level; train duration) were systematically varied. Under both current and frequency titration schedules, data indicated that response rate and titration point remained stable over repeated trials and multiple testing days--parameters being constant. Across all conditions, compared to the frequency titration schedule, subjects responding under the current titration schedule showed significantly higher titration points and lower rates of responding. Indicating the independence of rate and titration point data, parametric manipulations did not affect titration point and rate data concurrently. Results support the conclusion that titration point is a relative measure of "reward value" that is generally independent of response rate, but that is affected by manipulations that alter the amount of stimulation available between "resets". Additional work is needed in order to determine the relationship between the magnitude of stimulation needed to maintain minimal responding and that needed to maintain response equilibrium in an autotitration task.
传统的颅内自我刺激(ICSS)方法试图通过评估能够维持反应的最低刺激值,来评估脑刺激奖励价值的变化。然而,享乐强度的阈上指标(如滴定点)已显示出有序变化。在本实验中,训练大鼠在两种ICSS自动滴定程序上做出反应,其中在一个杠杆上的每次反应都会刺激内侧前脑束,每第X次反应会降低刺激电流或刺激频率。在任何时候,在第二个“重置”杠杆上的反应会将刺激杠杆上可用的刺激电流或频率恢复到其起始水平,并在操作上定义“奖励价值”的变化。为了研究这个滴定点测量指标,系统地改变了两个反应要求(反应次数/降压;步长)和两个刺激参数(初始刺激水平;训练持续时间)。在电流滴定和频率滴定程序下,数据表明,在参数恒定的情况下,重复试验和多个测试日期间,反应率和滴定点保持稳定。在所有条件下,与频率滴定程序相比,在电流滴定程序下做出反应的受试者显示出显著更高的滴定点和更低的反应率。表明反应率和滴定点数据相互独立,参数操作不会同时影响滴定点和反应率数据。结果支持这样的结论,即滴定点是“奖励价值”的相对测量指标,通常与反应率无关,但会受到改变“重置”之间可用刺激量的操作的影响。为了确定在自动滴定任务中维持最小反应所需的刺激强度与维持反应平衡所需的刺激强度之间的关系,还需要进一步的研究。