Bradley E, Walker L, Blechner B, Wetle T
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8034, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Jan;45(1):79-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb00983.x.
To better understand the implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) in long-term care, with a focus on the informing process as it affects advance directives.
Retrospective cohort study of nursing home admissions, using medical record reviews, and a companion qualitative survey using key informant interviews.
Eleven nursing homes in Connecticut.
A total of 600 residents randomly selected from six randomly chosen nursing homes and 19 key informants selected from five purposely sampled nursing homes in Connecticut.
Institutional compliance with the PSDA requirement to provide written information about advance directives at admission and aspects of the informing process, including to whom the information is given.
Compliance with the PSDA requirement to provide information at admission is high (90.7 of admissions in the post-PSDA cohort received information within 1 week of admission). However, in nearly 70% of admissions in which information was provided, someone other than the residents received the information. Staff often cited the resident's cognitive impairment as a reason for excluding residents from this informing process. However, even among those residents judged to be alert and oriented at admission, someone other than the resident received the information 47.7% of the time.
Substantial numbers of residents may be inappropriately excluded from participating in discussions because of difficulties in determining decisional capacity to discuss future treatment wishes. The research highlights the difficulties of enhancing resident participation and autonomy in long-term care through procedural regulations such as the PSDA. More reliable methods of determining resident decisional capacity are needed to integrate the full intent of the PSDA into clinical practice in long-term care.
为了更好地理解《患者自主决定法案》(PSDA)在长期护理中的实施情况,重点关注其对预先医疗指示产生影响的告知过程。
采用病历回顾法对养老院入院情况进行回顾性队列研究,并通过关键 informant 访谈进行一项配套的定性调查。
康涅狄格州的 11 家养老院。
从随机选择的 6 家养老院中随机抽取的 600 名居民,以及从康涅狄格州 5 家特意抽样的养老院中选取的 19 名关键 informant。
机构对 PSDA 要求在入院时提供关于预先医疗指示的书面信息的合规情况,以及告知过程的各个方面,包括信息提供给了谁。
在入院时提供信息方面,对 PSDA 要求的合规率很高(PSDA 实施后队列中 90.7%的入院患者在入院后 1 周内收到了信息)。然而,在近 70%提供了信息的入院案例中,接收信息的是居民以外的其他人。工作人员经常将居民的认知障碍作为将居民排除在这一告知过程之外的理由。然而,即使在那些入院时被判定为警觉且定向力正常的居民中,47.7%的情况下接收信息的也是居民以外的其他人。
由于难以确定讨论未来治疗意愿的决策能力,大量居民可能被不适当地排除在参与讨论之外。该研究凸显了通过诸如 PSDA 这样的程序法规来提高长期护理中居民参与度和自主性所面临的困难。需要更可靠的方法来确定居民的决策能力,以便将 PSDA 的全部意图融入长期护理的临床实践中。