• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃手术后的结直肠癌:一项荟萃分析。

Colorectal cancer after gastric surgery: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Munnangi S, Sonnenberg A

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jan;92(1):109-13.

PMID:8995948
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Until now, the question of whether previous gastric surgery results in an increased risk of colorectal cancer has remained controversial. A meta-analysis was performed to resolve this issue.

METHODS

The numbers of colorectal tumors in the two populations with and without gastric surgery were retrieved from all relevant articles found through a MEDLINE search. If available, the most detailed breakdown of the data by patient gender, type of peptic ulcer, type of surgery, time since gastric surgery, and by tumor location was chosen. The Mantel-Haenszel procedure was used to calculate a weighted odds ratio from the individual studies. The method of DerSimonian and Laird was used to calculate a weighted average of the difference between tumor rates in patients with and without gastric surgery.

RESULTS

The summary odds ratio was 1.09 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.96-1.24. The length of time after surgery, gender, tumor location, initial ulcer type, and different types of surgery were not associated with any significant influence. The summary rate difference was not significantly different from zero. The test for heterogeneity yielded a chi 2 = 26.87, df = 13, p = 0.013. After ignoring one obvious outlier study, the chi 2 test dropped to a nonsignificant level. A L'Abbé plot failed to show any prevailing influence of rate size on the overall heterogeneity among the various studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery for peptic ulcer does not result in an increased risk for colorectal tumors. This lack of influence was shown consistently by all tests of the present meta-analysis.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,既往胃手术是否会增加结直肠癌风险的问题一直存在争议。进行了一项荟萃分析以解决该问题。

方法

通过医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)检索所有相关文章,获取有胃手术史和无胃手术史两组人群中的结直肠肿瘤数量。若数据可用,则选择按患者性别、消化性溃疡类型、手术类型、胃手术后时间以及肿瘤位置进行的最详细数据分类。采用曼特尔 - 亨塞尔程序从各个研究中计算加权比值比。使用德西蒙尼安和莱尔德方法计算有胃手术史和无胃手术史患者肿瘤发生率差异的加权平均值。

结果

汇总比值比为1.09,95%置信区间为0.96 - 1.24。手术后时间长短、性别、肿瘤位置、初始溃疡类型以及不同手术类型均未显示出任何显著影响。汇总率差与零无显著差异。异质性检验得出卡方值 = 26.87,自由度 = 13,p = 0.013。在忽略一项明显的离群研究后,卡方检验降至无显著意义水平。L'Abbé图未显示率大小对各项研究总体异质性有任何主要影响。

结论

消化性溃疡手术不会增加结直肠肿瘤风险。本荟萃分析的所有检验均一致表明不存在这种影响。

相似文献

1
Colorectal cancer after gastric surgery: a meta-analysis.胃手术后的结直肠癌:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jan;92(1):109-13.
2
Diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.糖尿病与结直肠癌风险:一项荟萃分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Nov 16;97(22):1679-87. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji375.
3
Gastric, pancreatic, and colorectal carcinogenesis following remote peptic ulcer surgery. Review of the literature with the emphasis on risk assessment and underlying mechanism.远端消化性溃疡手术后的胃癌、胰腺癌和结直肠癌发生。文献综述,重点关注风险评估和潜在机制。
Mod Pathol. 1988 Sep;1(5):352-6.
4
Optimal vitamin D status for colorectal cancer prevention: a quantitative meta analysis.预防结直肠癌的最佳维生素D状态:一项定量荟萃分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Mar;32(3):210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.11.004.
5
Synchronous colorectal neoplasms in patients with colorectal cancer: predisposing individual and familial factors.结直肠癌患者的同步性结直肠肿瘤:个体及家族易感因素
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jul;47(7):1192-200. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0562-7. Epub 2004 May 28.
6
The lack of association between adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric surgery: a retrospective study.食管癌与胃手术之间缺乏关联:一项回顾性研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Feb;92(2):216-21.
7
[Criteria for training in laparoscopic gastric surgery: guidelines and experience of 30 cases].[腹腔镜胃手术培训标准:30例病例的指南与经验]
Minerva Chir. 2005 Feb;60(1):23-30.
8
[Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].[意大利关于空气污染短期影响研究的荟萃分析]
Epidemiol Prev. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2 Suppl):1-71.
9
The association between Helicobacter pylori infection and early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.幽门螺杆菌感染与早期胃癌的关联:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1789-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01335.x. Epub 2007 May 23.
10
Obesity and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 31 studies with 70,000 events.肥胖与结直肠癌风险:对31项研究、70000例事件的荟萃分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Dec;16(12):2533-47. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0708.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating meta-analyses in the general surgical literature: a critical appraisal.评估普通外科文献中的荟萃分析:一项批判性评价。
Ann Surg. 2005 Mar;241(3):450-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000154258.30305.df.