Dole E J, Holdsworth M T
College of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque 87131, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 1997 Jan;31(1):65-75. doi: 10.1177/106002809703100112.
To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and adverse effects of nilutamide and to compare this agent with the currently marketed nonsteroidal antiandrogens (i.e., bicalutamide, flutamide) by critically analyzing the published literature.
MEDLINE (1980-1995) and CANCERLIT (1991-1995) were searched for English-language publications using the terms nilutamide, bicalutamide, and flutamide alone, and either nilutamide or androgen antagonists in combination with prostatic neoplasms.
All articles with subject matter on nilutamide, bicalutamide, and flutamide were considered for inclusion. For studies published in more than one journal, the first publication was used unless a subsequent publication included additional or follow-up data, in which case the latter publication was cited instead.
Nilutamide was effective in combination with orchiectomy in improving responses in patients with advanced prostate cancer. However, patient survival was not improved in these trials, and improvements in bone pain did not usually result in improved performance status in these patients. The few trials of nilutamide monotherapy or nilutamide in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog are too small to draw meaningful conclusions regarding its efficacy or its role in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. No comparative trials of nilutamide with other antiandrogens and no analysis of the impact of nilutamide on patient quality of life are currently available. Nilutamide appears to produce a higher frequency of adverse effects than the other currently marketed nonsteroidal antiandrogens, bicalutamide and flutamide.
Nilutamide does not appear to represent a major advance in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer and appears to be somewhat inferior to both flutamide and bicalutamide with regard to adverse effects. Nilutamide should not be considered the antiandrogen of choice in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.
通过批判性分析已发表的文献,回顾尼鲁米特的药理学、药代动力学、疗效及不良反应,并将该药物与目前上市的非甾体类抗雄激素药物(即比卡鲁胺、氟他胺)进行比较。
检索MEDLINE(1980 - 1995年)和CANCERLIT(1991 - 1995年),以查找仅使用术语尼鲁米特、比卡鲁胺和氟他胺,以及尼鲁米特或雄激素拮抗剂与前列腺肿瘤联合使用的英文出版物。
所有涉及尼鲁米特、比卡鲁胺和氟他胺主题的文章均被考虑纳入。对于在多个期刊上发表的研究,除非后续发表的文章包含额外或随访数据,否则使用首次发表的文章,在此情况下则引用后者。
尼鲁米特与睾丸切除术联合使用可有效改善晚期前列腺癌患者的反应。然而,在这些试验中患者生存率并未提高,且骨痛的改善通常并未导致这些患者的身体状况改善。关于尼鲁米特单药治疗或尼鲁米特与促黄体生成素释放激素类似物联合使用的试验数量过少,无法就其疗效或在晚期前列腺癌治疗中的作用得出有意义的结论。目前尚无尼鲁米特与其他抗雄激素药物的对比试验,也没有关于尼鲁米特对患者生活质量影响的分析。与目前上市的其他非甾体类抗雄激素药物比卡鲁胺和氟他胺相比,尼鲁米特似乎产生不良反应的频率更高。
在晚期前列腺癌治疗中,尼鲁米特似乎并未取得重大进展,且在不良反应方面似乎略逊于氟他胺和比卡鲁胺。在晚期前列腺癌治疗中,不应将尼鲁米特视为首选的抗雄激素药物。