Kalish S C, Bohn R L, Avorn J
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Med Care. 1997 Jan;35(1):32-48. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199701000-00003.
The authors assess the costs associated with treatment of dyspepsia with histamine2 antagonists versus without availability of over-the-counter (OTC).
A cost analysis was performed using a decision-analysis model. Patients with an initial episode of dyspepsia were studied. The model includes costs associated with consumption of OTC and prescription (Rx) medications for dyspepsia, physician visits and associated diagnostic testing, time spent for physician visits and diagnostic tests, and hospitalization costs.
The model is sensitive to the relative cost of histamine2 antagonists when purchased Rx or OTC, as well as to the efficacy of these drugs in relieving dyspeptic symptoms. For patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (the largest group of likely consumers), the model demonstrates a cost savings if the OTC cost of the medication is slightly less than one third the Rx cost. Costs are similar whether or not histamine2 antagonists are available OTC. If the symptom relief efficacies of histamine2 antagonists are equivalent whether purchased by prescription only or OTC, then the health-care expenditures for a typical patient with dyspepsia are $204 for OTC availability and $203 for Rx-only use. Viewing costs from the perspective of a managed-care organization, expenditures for an episode of dyspepsia are $149 regardless of whether or not histamine2 antagonists are available OTC. Restricting the analysis to patients with underlying nonulcer dyspepsia yields similar results. Variation of numerous assumptions and probabilities other than histamine antagonist cost and efficacy, including costs associated with physician visits and diagnostic tests, and the likelihood of seeking medical care, do not substantially affect the results of the model.
Health-care costs associated with initial treatment of dyspepsia are similar regardless of the availability of histamine2 antagonists OTC. This is due largely to the similar efficacy of these drugs compared with antacids and the predicted increase in diagnostic testing that may result if a patient visits a physician after failure to achieve symptom relief with OTC use of histamine2 antagonists.
作者评估使用组胺2拮抗剂治疗消化不良与无非处方(OTC)药物可用情况下的治疗成本。
使用决策分析模型进行成本分析。对消化不良初发患者进行研究。该模型包括与消化不良的非处方和处方(Rx)药物消费、医生诊疗及相关诊断检查、医生诊疗和诊断检查所花费的时间以及住院费用相关的成本。
该模型对组胺2拮抗剂按处方购买或非处方购买时的相对成本以及这些药物缓解消化不良症状的疗效敏感。对于非溃疡性消化不良患者(可能的最大消费群体),如果药物的非处方成本略低于处方成本的三分之一,该模型显示成本会节省。无论组胺2拮抗剂是否有非处方药可用,成本相似。如果组胺2拮抗剂无论仅通过处方购买还是非处方购买其缓解症状的疗效相同,那么对于典型的消化不良患者,非处方药可用时的医疗保健支出为204美元,仅使用处方药时为203美元。从管理式医疗组织的角度来看成本,无论组胺2拮抗剂是否有非处方药可用,一次消化不良发作的支出均为149美元。将分析限制在患有潜在非溃疡性消化不良的患者中会得出类似结果。除了组胺拮抗剂成本和疗效之外的许多假设和概率的变化,包括与医生诊疗和诊断检查相关的成本以及寻求医疗护理的可能性,并不能实质性地影响模型结果。
无论组胺2拮抗剂是否有非处方药可用,与消化不良初始治疗相关的医疗保健成本相似。这主要是由于这些药物与抗酸剂相比疗效相似,以及如果患者在非处方使用组胺2拮抗剂未能缓解症状后就医可能导致的诊断检查增加所致。