Shi Chih-Wen, Asch Steven M, Fielder Eve, Gelberg Lillian, Brook Robert H, Leake Barbara, Shapiro Martin F, Dowling Patrick, Nichol Michael
University of California-Los Angeles, Departments of Family Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif. 90095, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Apr;18(4):281-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20709.x.
Little is known about how the public uses formerly prescription medications that are available over-the-counter (OTC). This study examines whether consumers inappropriately use and substitute a recently widely distributed OTC urinary analgesic, phenazopyridine, for provider care.
DESIGN/SETTING: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of a stratified cluster random sample of OTC phenazopyridine purchasers (N = 434) in 31 Los Angeles retail pharmacies over 5 months. Recruited by shelf advertisements, participants were 18 years or older who purchased a phenazopyridine product. Each completed a 25-item self-administered anonymous questionnaire. Inappropriate use was defined as 1) having medical contraindications to phenazopyridine, or 2) not having concurrent antibiotic and/or provider evaluation for the urinary symptoms.
The survey response rate was 58%. Fifty-one percent of the respondents used OTC phenazopyridine inappropriately, and 38% substituted it for medical care. Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that inappropriate use was correlated with having little time to see a provider (odds ratio [OR], 1.57; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.26 to 1.96), receiving friend's or family's advice (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.47), having prior urinary tract infections (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.80), having used prescription phenazopyridine, (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.63), and having back pain (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.74). Similar correlates were found in those who substituted OTC phenazopyridine for provider care. Respondents with incorrect knowledge about phenazopyridine's mode of action had 1.9 times greater odds of inappropriate use and 2.2 times greater odds of substitution than those who had correct knowledge about this drug.
Inappropriate use of OTC phenazopyridine appears common. Increasing the public's knowledge about reclassified drugs may help to mitigate this problem.
对于公众如何使用以前的处方药(现可作为非处方药(OTC)获得),我们了解甚少。本研究调查消费者是否不恰当地使用并替代一种最近广泛销售的非处方泌尿镇痛剂非那吡啶来寻求医疗服务。
设计/地点:我们在5个月内对洛杉矶31家零售药店中分层整群随机抽取的非那吡啶购买者(N = 434)进行了横断面调查。通过货架广告招募参与者,参与者为18岁及以上购买非那吡啶产品的人。每人完成一份25项的自填式匿名问卷。不恰当使用被定义为:1)有非那吡啶的医学禁忌证,或2)对泌尿系统症状未同时使用抗生素和/或未接受医生评估。
调查回复率为58%。51%的受访者不恰当地使用非处方非那吡啶,38%用其替代医疗服务。多项逻辑回归分析显示,不恰当使用与几乎没有时间看医生(比值比[OR],1.57;95%置信区间[95%CI],1.26至1.96)、接受朋友或家人的建议(OR,1.25;95%CI,1.05至1.47)、既往有尿路感染(OR,0.49;95%CI,0.30至0.80)、曾使用过处方非那吡啶(OR,0.40;95%CI,0.25至0.63)以及有背痛(OR,0.34;95%CI,0.16至0.74)相关。在那些用非处方非那吡啶替代医疗服务的人中也发现了类似的相关因素。对非那吡啶作用方式了解错误的受访者不恰当使用的几率比了解正确的受访者高1.9倍,替代的几率高2.2倍。
非处方非那吡啶的不恰当使用似乎很常见。增加公众对重新分类药物的了解可能有助于缓解这一问题。