• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[肠道真菌的致病性——讨论现状]

[Pathogenicity of fungi in the intestines--current status of the discussion].

作者信息

Scheurlen M

机构信息

Medizinische Poliklinik, Universität, Würzburg.

出版信息

Fortschr Med. 1996 Sep 20;114(26):319-21.

PMID:8999002
Abstract

The hypothesis that colonization of the intestinal tract by yeasts (e.g. Candida albicans) can lead to disease in immunocompromised individuals is currently being discussed controversially. Proponents assume that toxins produced by the fungi can trigger such complaints as irritable bowel syndrome of the chronic fatigue syndrome, and that such chronic or recurrent infections may be caused by an intestinal reservoir of yeasts. Opponents of the hypothesis, however, point out that no hard data on the pathogenetic significance of an intestinal reservoir of yeasts are available, controlled studies have failed to demonstrate the effectiveness of antifungal treatment. Discussions are however, hampered by a lack of objective data. The postulated pathomechanisms therefore need to be clarified, diagnostic criteria developed, and the efficacy of the proposed therapeutic measures shown by controlled studies. Until this has been done, assumption about the pathogenicity of yeasts in the bowel, cannot be taken as a basis for binding therapeutic recommendations.

摘要

酵母(如白色念珠菌)在肠道内定植会导致免疫功能低下个体发病的假说,目前正受到争议性的讨论。支持者认为,真菌产生的毒素可引发诸如肠易激综合征或慢性疲劳综合征等症状,且此类慢性或复发性感染可能由肠道内酵母储存库引起。然而,该假说的反对者指出,目前尚无关于肠道酵母储存库致病意义的确切数据,对照研究也未能证明抗真菌治疗的有效性。不过,由于缺乏客观数据,讨论受到了阻碍。因此,需要阐明假定的发病机制,制定诊断标准,并通过对照研究证明所提议治疗措施的疗效。在此之前,关于酵母在肠道内致病性的假设不能作为具有约束力的治疗建议的依据。

相似文献

1
[Pathogenicity of fungi in the intestines--current status of the discussion].[肠道真菌的致病性——讨论现状]
Fortschr Med. 1996 Sep 20;114(26):319-21.
2
[Intestinal mycoses--do they exist?].[肠道真菌病——它们存在吗?]
Leber Magen Darm. 1993 Sep;23(5):184-5.
3
[Fungi in the oro-intestinal tract and their scientifically founded status].[口腔肠道中的真菌及其科学认定状况]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1998 Apr;92(3):157-62.
4
[Normal findings or disease? Fungi in the bowel].
MMW Fortschr Med. 2003 Jul 10;145(27-28):10.
5
[How dangerous is Candida in the intestine? The great fungal business].
MMW Fortschr Med. 2000 Jul 20;142(28-29):4-6.
6
[Fungal infection of the small bowel mucosa].
Mykosen. 1984 Oct;27(10):506-10.
7
[Recommendations of the Robert Koch Institute. Pathogenetic significance of intestinal candida colonization. Report of the "Methods and Quality Assurance in Environmental Medicine" Committee of the Robert Koch Institute].[罗伯特·科赫研究所的建议。肠道念珠菌定植的发病机制意义。罗伯特·科赫研究所“环境医学中的方法与质量保证”委员会报告]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2004 Jun;47(6):587-600. doi: 10.1007/s00103-004-0860-1.
8
[Fungal involvement of the intestinal tract in HIV-positive males].[艾滋病毒阳性男性肠道的真菌感染]
Z Hautkr. 1988 Apr 15;63(4):336-7.
9
[Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans interaction in the respiratory tract: from pathophysiology to a therapeutic perspective].[铜绿假单胞菌与白色念珠菌在呼吸道中的相互作用:从病理生理学到治疗学视角]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 2008 May;56(3):164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2007.06.002. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
10
[Fungal infection after antibiotic therapy (author's transl)].抗生素治疗后的真菌感染(作者译)
MMW Munch Med Wochenschr. 1976 May 21;118(21):669-72.