Cobbold S P, Adams E, Marshall S E, Davies J D, Waldmann H
Therapeutic Immunology Group, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, Oxford, UK.
Immunol Rev. 1996 Feb;149:5-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1996.tb00897.x.
Over the last five years it has become increasingly clear that the peripheral immune system can maintain tolerance to both self and non-self antigens through a variety of mechanisms. Although clonal deletion may play an important part in limiting rapidly expanding responses, there are many examples where antigen reactive T cells remain. It has been proposed that tolerance is maintained in this situation either by the induction of anergy or by ongoing suppression. The phenomenon known as immune deviation, where non-inflammatory Th2 responses could suppress Th1 and positively reinforce themselves provided an attractive explanation for infectious tolerance, where tolerant T cells could guide further naive T cells also to tolerance. However, experiments to test this hypothesis in the models of CD4 and CD8 antibody-induced tolerance have given conflicting data, with no clear evidence of Th2 responses in tolerant mice. In this paper we review recent data that IL-4 plays a role in suppression, but that the source of IL-4 may not be the tolerant/suppressor T cell. We also discuss how infectious tolerance can operate on third party antigens if they are linked on the same antigen presenting cell and how CD4+ T cells can suppress CD8+ T-cell responses. Finally, we suggest a model of infectious anergy that is compatible with the available data.
在过去五年中,越来越清楚的是,外周免疫系统可通过多种机制维持对自身和非自身抗原的耐受性。虽然克隆清除可能在限制快速扩展的反应中起重要作用,但有许多例子表明抗原反应性T细胞依然存在。有人提出,在这种情况下,耐受性是通过无反应性的诱导或持续抑制来维持的。被称为免疫偏离的现象,即非炎性Th2反应可抑制Th1并自我正向增强,为感染性耐受提供了一个有吸引力的解释,即耐受的T细胞可引导更多幼稚T细胞也走向耐受。然而,在CD4和CD8抗体诱导的耐受模型中检验这一假设的实验给出了相互矛盾的数据,在耐受小鼠中没有Th2反应的明确证据。在本文中,我们综述了近期的数据,即IL-4在抑制中起作用,但IL-4的来源可能不是耐受/抑制性T细胞。我们还讨论了如果第三方抗原与同一抗原呈递细胞相连,感染性耐受如何作用于这些抗原,以及CD4+T细胞如何抑制CD8+T细胞反应。最后,我们提出了一个与现有数据相符的感染性无反应性模型。