Ofili E O, Dressler F A, St Vrain J A, Goodgold H, Standeven J, Chandel B, Gentilcore R, McBride L, Castello R, Kern M, Labovitz A J
Department of Internal Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA.
Am Heart J. 1997 Jan;133(1):78-86. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(97)70251-5.
Variations in reported sensitivity of myocardial perfusion scans or wall motion abnormalities during pharmacologic stress with intravenous adenosine and dipyridamole may be caused by differences in myocardial oxygen demand or myocardial blood flow redistribution induced by each agent. To investigate the physiologic correlates of functional abnormalities during pharmacologic stress testing, regional myocardial blood flow (radiolabeled microsphere technique) and left ventricular segmental wall thickening (quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography) were measured in 9 dogs with an open chest model of critical stenosis of the left circumflex coronary artery. Data were obtained at baseline and peak drug infusion for intravenous adenosine (0.42 mg/kg over a 3-minute period) and for intravenous dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg over a 4-minute period). Adenosine and dipyridamole induced regional flow abnormality in 7 (77%) of 9 dogs. Myocardial segments with decreased endocardial/epicardial flow ratio were similar for both agents (2.9 +/- 1.8 vs 2.7 +/- 1.3, p = [NS]). Segments with myocardial flow heterogeneity (ratio of endocardial flow to control left anterior descending/left circumflex endocardial flow) were similar for both agents (2.7 +/- 0.9 vs 2.3 +/- 1.0, p = NS). Adenosine-induced wall thickening abnormality (77% vs 55% with dipyridamole) correlated with regional flow abnormality. Significantly lower mean arterial pressure (53 +/- 1.7 mm Hg vs 64 +/- 1.9 mm Hg, p < 0.01) and more prolonged drug effect (18 +/- 6.4 min vs 3 +/- 1.4 min, p < 0.001) were seen for dipyridamole compared with adenosine. Adenosine induces regional flow abnormality similar to dipyridamole but with less hemodynamic perturbation, and adenosine-induced wall thickening abnormality more closely parallels regional flow abnormality.
静脉注射腺苷和双嘧达莫进行药物负荷试验时,心肌灌注扫描或室壁运动异常的报告敏感性存在差异,这可能是由于每种药物引起的心肌需氧量差异或心肌血流重新分布所致。为了研究药物负荷试验期间功能异常的生理相关性,我们采用左旋支冠状动脉严重狭窄的开胸犬模型,对9只犬测量了局部心肌血流(放射性微球技术)和左心室节段性室壁增厚(定量二维超声心动图)。在基线状态以及静脉注射腺苷(3分钟内注射0.42mg/kg)和静脉注射双嘧达莫(4分钟内注射0.56mg/kg)的药物输注峰值时获取数据。腺苷和双嘧达莫在9只犬中的7只(77%)诱发了局部血流异常。两种药物导致心内膜/心外膜血流比值降低的心肌节段相似(分别为2.9±1.8和2.7±1.3,p = [无统计学意义])。两种药物导致心肌血流异质性(心内膜血流与对照左前降支/左旋支心内膜血流的比值)的节段相似(分别为2.7±0.9和2.3±1.0,p = 无统计学意义)。腺苷诱发的室壁增厚异常(77%,双嘧达莫为55%)与局部血流异常相关。与腺苷相比,双嘧达莫的平均动脉压显著更低(分别为53±1.7mmHg和64±1.9mmHg,p < 0.01),药物作用持续时间更长(分别为18±6.4分钟和3±1.4分钟,p < 0.001)。腺苷诱发的局部血流异常与双嘧达莫相似,但对血流动力学的干扰较小,且腺苷诱发的室壁增厚异常与局部血流异常的相关性更密切。