Suppr超能文献

一项比较重组干扰素-γ与安慰剂治疗类风湿关节炎24周的随机双盲研究。

A randomized, double-blind study comparing twenty-four-week treatment with recombinant interferon-gamma versus placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Veys E M, Menkes C J, Emery P

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Jan;40(1):62-8. doi: 10.1002/art.1780400110.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of recombinant interferon-gamma (rIFN gamma) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using an induction and maintenance regimen.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of 197 patients with RA was conducted to compare the effects in a group receiving 50 micrograms of rIFN gamma, given subcutaneously in a decreasing regimen over 24 weeks, with those in a placebo group receiving injections of placebo at the same time frequency. Standard clinical assessments were performed.

RESULTS

Both rIFN gamma and placebo produced a significant improvement from baseline to end point visit for most measurements (except erythrocyte sedimentation rate, duration of morning stiffness, and grip strength), but no significant intergroup differences were seen. Regarding adverse effects, mild local skin reactions at the site of injection were observed, and among the cardiovascular events, mild edema and vasodilatation were reported.

CONCLUSION

IFN gamma proved no more effective than placebo in this group of patients with RA. IFN gamma was well tolerated in this group of patients, without increased toxicity compared with placebo.

摘要

目的

采用诱导和维持治疗方案,评估重组干扰素-γ(rIFNγ)对活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的安全性和疗效。

方法

对197例RA患者进行多中心、随机、双盲试验,比较一组接受50微克rIFNγ皮下注射、在24周内递减给药方案的效果与另一组同时接受安慰剂注射的效果。进行了标准的临床评估。

结果

对于大多数测量指标(红细胞沉降率、晨僵持续时间和握力除外),从基线到终点访视,rIFNγ和安慰剂均产生了显著改善,但未观察到显著的组间差异。关于不良反应,观察到注射部位有轻度局部皮肤反应,在心血管事件中,报告有轻度水肿和血管扩张。

结论

在这组RA患者中,IFNγ并未证明比安慰剂更有效。这组患者对IFNγ耐受性良好,与安慰剂相比无毒性增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验