Suppr超能文献

R-Ras受不同于控制Ras功能的激活剂和效应器的调控。

R-Ras is regulated by activators and effectors distinct from those that control Ras function.

作者信息

Huff S Y, Quilliam L A, Cox A D, Der C J

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, 27599, USA.

出版信息

Oncogene. 1997 Jan 16;14(2):133-43. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1200815.

Abstract

Like Ras, constitutively activated mutants of the Ras-related protein R-Ras cause tumorigenic transformation of NIH3T3 cells. However, since R-Ras causes a transformed phenotype distinct from that induced by Ras, it is likely that R-Ras controls signaling pathways and cellular processes distinct from those regulated by Ras. To address this possibility, we determined if R-Ras is regulated by activators and effectors distinct from those that regulate Ras function. We observed that Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factors failed to activate R-Ras in vivo, indicating that R-Ras is activated by distinct GEFs. Consistent with this, mutants of R-Ras with mutations analogous to the Ras(15A)/(17N) dominant negative proteins did not antagonize Ras GEF function and lacked the growth inhibitory activity seen with these mutant Ras proteins. Thus, R-Ras, but not Ras, is dispensable for the viability of NIH3T3 cells. Finally, whereas constitutively activated Ras can overcome the growth inhibitory action of the Ras(17N) dominant negative protein via Raf-dependent and -independent activities, transforming mutants of R-Ras failed to do so. This inability was consistent with our observation that Ras-, but not R-Ras-transformed, NIH3T3 cells possessed constitutively upregulated Raf kinase activities. Thus, R-Ras and Ras are regulators of distinct signaling pathways and cellular processes.

摘要

与Ras一样,Ras相关蛋白R-Ras的组成型激活突变体可导致NIH3T3细胞发生致瘤转化。然而,由于R-Ras诱导的转化表型与Ras诱导的不同,R-Ras可能控制着与Ras所调节的不同的信号通路和细胞过程。为了探究这种可能性,我们确定R-Ras是否受与调节Ras功能的激活剂和效应器不同的激活剂和效应器的调节。我们观察到Ras鸟嘌呤核苷酸交换因子在体内无法激活R-Ras,这表明R-Ras是由不同的鸟嘌呤核苷酸交换因子(GEFs)激活的。与此一致的是,具有与Ras(15A)/(17N)显性负性蛋白类似突变的R-Ras突变体不会拮抗Ras鸟嘌呤核苷酸交换因子的功能,并且缺乏这些突变Ras蛋白所具有的生长抑制活性。因此,R-Ras而非Ras对于NIH3T3细胞的存活是可有可无的。最后,虽然组成型激活的Ras可以通过依赖Raf和不依赖Raf的活性克服Ras(17N)显性负性蛋白的生长抑制作用,但R-Ras的转化突变体却无法做到这一点。这种无能与我们的观察结果一致,即Ras转化而非R-Ras转化的NIH3T3细胞具有组成型上调的Raf激酶活性。因此,R-Ras和Ras是不同信号通路和细胞过程的调节因子。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验