Farrell G C
Storr Liver Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Australia.
Dig Dis Sci. 1996 Dec;41(12 Suppl):93S-98S. doi: 10.1007/BF02087882.
Short-term (end-of-treatment) responses (ETR) to interferon (IFN) therapy for chronic hepatitis C are encouraging; however, the relapse rate is high, and long-term response is obtained in only 12-25% of patients. The Australian Hepatitis C Study Group conducted a trial of 230 patients that compared the standard 3 MU three times a week six-month course of IFN-alpha2b with 5 MU three times a week for six months (5 MU group) or 3 MU three times a week for two years (two-year group). ETR (normalization of serum aminotransferase level until the end of treatment) rates based on an intent-to-treat analysis were 64% for the 5 MU group and 58% for the combined 3 MU groups. After six months of treatment, the overall relapse rate was 71%, and the long-term response (LTR; continued normal aminotransferase until six month follow up) rate did not differ significantly between the 3 MU (17% of all treated, 27% ETR) and 5 MU groups (20% of all treated, 31% ETR). In contrast, among the 46 patients who exhibited an ETR in the two-year group, 27 (59%) had a LTR to IFN, resulting in an overall LTR rate of 33% for all patients treated for up to two years (P < 0.001 compared with 3 MU group). Among these 46 subjects, 11 did not complete the full two-year course, including eight who withdrew due to adverse effects. Nine of these 11 patients had received at least 12 months of therapy. All 18 LTR subjects tested (irrespective of treatment group) were serum HCV-RNA negative at the 12-month follow-up evaluation. Improvement in hepatic inflammation was significantly greater among those treated for two years compared with six months, but there was no reduction in fibrosis score in any group. Among the entire study group, treatment duration, liver histology, and liver function (assessed by antipyrine clearance test) were the only independent predictors of ETR, although HCV genotype was closely related to histological severity (eg, cirrhosis was present in 60% of type 1 and 18% of type 3). Viral load and duration of infection were additional predictors of LTR; however, there were insufficient data to determine whether prolonging treatment beyond six months overcomes the negative impact of these predictors. Continuing IFN therapy for at least 12 months decreases the relapse rate by 50% and thereby improves the LTR rate compared with a six-month treatment course. However, our experience of 24 months of treatment indicates that initial IFN treatment courses of this duration are not well tolerated by approximately 20% (8/46) of patients and are unlikely to improve the results obtained with 12-18 months of treatment.
慢性丙型肝炎患者接受干扰素(IFN)治疗的短期(治疗结束时)反应(ETR)令人鼓舞;然而,复发率很高,只有12% - 25%的患者能获得长期反应。澳大利亚丙型肝炎研究小组对230名患者进行了一项试验,比较了标准的每周三次、每次3 MU、为期6个月的α - 干扰素2b疗程与每周三次、每次5 MU、为期6个月(5 MU组)或每周三次、每次3 MU、为期两年(两年组)的疗程。基于意向性分析的ETR(至治疗结束时血清氨基转移酶水平正常化)率,5 MU组为64%,联合3 MU组为58%。治疗6个月后,总体复发率为71%,3 MU组(所有接受治疗者的17%,ETR者的27%)和5 MU组(所有接受治疗者的20%,ETR者的31%)的长期反应(LTR;至6个月随访时氨基转移酶持续正常)率无显著差异。相比之下,在两年组中表现出ETR的46名患者中,27名(59%)对IFN有LTR,导致接受长达两年治疗的所有患者的总体LTR率为33%(与3 MU组相比,P < 0.001)。在这46名受试者中,11名未完成完整的两年疗程,其中8名因不良反应退出。这11名患者中有9名接受了至少12个月的治疗。所有18名接受检测的LTR受试者(无论治疗组如何)在12个月随访评估时血清HCV - RNA均为阴性。与治疗6个月的患者相比,接受两年治疗的患者肝脏炎症改善更为显著,但任何组的纤维化评分均未降低。在整个研究组中,治疗持续时间、肝脏组织学和肝功能(通过安替比林清除试验评估)是ETR的唯一独立预测因素,尽管HCV基因型与组织学严重程度密切相关(例如,1型患者中有60%存在肝硬化,3型患者中有18%存在肝硬化)。病毒载量和感染持续时间是LTR的额外预测因素;然而,数据不足,无法确定将治疗延长至6个月以上是否能克服这些预测因素的负面影响。与6个月的治疗疗程相比,持续IFN治疗至少12个月可使复发率降低50%,从而提高LTR率。然而,我们24个月的治疗经验表明,约20%(8/46)的患者对这种持续时间的初始IFN治疗疗程耐受性不佳,且不太可能改善12 - 18个月治疗所取得的结果。