MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997 Jan 17;46(2):25-9.
Infections with bloodborne pathogens resulting from exposures to blood through percutaneous injuries (PIs) (e.g., needlestick injuries and cuts with sharp objects) are an occupational hazard for health-care workers (HCWs). PIs have been reported during 1% - 15% of surgical procedures, mostly associated with suturing. Most suturing is done using curved suture needles, although straight needles are used by some surgeons for suturing skin. Blunt suture needles (curved suture needles that have a relatively blunt tip) may be less likely to cause PIs because they do not easily penetrate skin. Based on small studies and anecdotal experience, blunt suture needles appear able to replace conventional curved suture needles for suturing many tissues, although they may require more pressure to penetrate the tissues. This report summarizes results of a study in which CDC collaborated with three teaching hospitals in New York City during 1993-1994 to evaluate a safety device (a blunt suture needle) in gynecologic surgery. The findings indicate that use of blunt needles was associated with statistically significant reductions in PI rates, minimal clinically apparent adverse effects on patient care, and general acceptance by gynecologic surgeons in these hospitals.
医护人员因经皮损伤(PI)(如针刺伤和锐器割伤)接触血液而感染血源性病原体是一种职业危害。据报告,在1%至15%的外科手术过程中发生过经皮损伤,大多与缝合有关。大多数缝合使用弯形缝合针,不过有些外科医生用直针缝合皮肤。钝头缝合针(针尖相对钝圆的弯形缝合针)可能不太容易导致经皮损伤,因为它们不容易穿透皮肤。根据小型研究和轶事经验,钝头缝合针似乎能够替代传统弯形缝合针用于缝合多种组织,尽管它们可能需要更大的压力来穿透组织。本报告总结了一项研究的结果,1993 - 1994年期间疾病预防控制中心与纽约市的三家教学医院合作,在妇科手术中评估一种安全装置(钝头缝合针)。研究结果表明,使用钝针与经皮损伤发生率在统计学上显著降低相关,对患者护理的临床明显不良影响最小,并且这些医院的妇科外科医生普遍接受。