Geldmacher D S, Hills E C
Department of Neurology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, USA.
Brain Inj. 1997 Jan;11(1):59-66. doi: 10.1080/026990597123818.
The object of this study was to investigate stimulus effects and motor limitations on visuospatial performance after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Previous findings have not fully explained the basis of attentional impairments after TBI. There has been little study of the spatial aspects of attention and information processing in this group. We studied 20 patients after severe TBI and 21 healthy controls. Four random-array letter cancellation tasks, varying in number of stimuli (50 and 100) and target-to-distractor ratio (1:4 and 1:9) were employed. Performance was calculated from the number and proportion of cancelled targets, as well as time to completion. TBI subjects were slower on finger tapping and achieved lower cancellation performance scores. Both TBI subjects and controls performed better on tasks with target-to-distractor (T/D) ratios of 1:4 than on those with 1:9. There was no effect of stimulus number. We conclude that there are both quantitative (speed) and qualitative contributors to impaired visuospatial ability following TBI. Motor impairments may slow the overall cancellation performance, but the differential effect of T/D ratio in the two populations suggests that TBI impairs quality of research. Accounting for both speed and accuracy suggests increased utility for the cancellation paradigm in clinical and research assessment of visuospatial attention.
本研究的目的是调查创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后刺激效应和运动限制对视觉空间表现的影响。先前的研究尚未完全解释TBI后注意力损伤的基础。对该群体注意力和信息处理的空间方面研究甚少。我们研究了20名重度TBI患者和21名健康对照者。采用了四项随机阵列字母划消任务,刺激数量(50和100)和目标与干扰项比例(1:4和1:9)各不相同。根据划消目标的数量和比例以及完成时间来计算表现。TBI受试者的手指敲击速度较慢,划消表现得分较低。TBI受试者和对照组在目标与干扰项(T/D)比例为1:4的任务上比在1:9的任务上表现更好。刺激数量没有影响。我们得出结论,TBI后视觉空间能力受损存在定量(速度)和定性因素。运动损伤可能会减慢整体划消表现,但两组人群中T/D比例的差异效应表明TBI损害了研究质量。同时考虑速度和准确性表明划消范式在视觉空间注意力的临床和研究评估中具有更高的效用。