Suppr超能文献

联合神经肌肉电刺激和经皮电刺激神经治疗慢性背痛:一项双盲、重复测量比较研究

Combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for treatment of chronic back pain: a double-blind, repeated measures comparison.

作者信息

Moore S R, Shurman J

机构信息

Center for Neurologic Study, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Jan;78(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90010-1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A preliminary examination of NMES and combined NMES/TENS for the management of chronic back pain.

DESIGN

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized repeated measures.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

Consecutive sample of 24 chronic back pain patients (16 women and 8 men) attending an outpatient pain clinic (mean age 51.67 years, mean pain duration 3.83 years). All treatments were administered at home.

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects self-administered NMES, combined NMES/TENS, TENS, and placebo treatments. Each treatment had a duration of 5 consecutive hours per day over 2 consecutive days, with a 2-day hiatus between treatments to minimize carryover effects.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain reduction was assessed through pretreatment to posttreatment differences on the Present Pain Intensity (PPI) scale, and a visual analogue scale of Pain Intensity (VAS-I). Posttreatment pain relief was assessed using a visual analogue scale of Pain Relief (VAS-R).

RESULTS

Combined treatment, NMES, and TENS each produced significant pretreatment to posttreatment reductions in pain intensity as measured by both the PPI and VAS-I (p < .05). Combined treatment was superior to placebo on pain reduction (p = .001, p = .016) as well as pain relief (p < .001). Combined treatment was also superior to both TENS and NMES for pain reduction and pain relief (p < .01). NMES and TENS were superior only to placebo for pain relief (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined NMES/TENS treatment consistently produced greater pain reduction and pain relief than placebo, TENS, or NMES. NMES alone, although less effective, did produce as much pain relief as TENS. Although preliminary, this pattern of results suggests that combined NMES/TENS may be a valuable adjunct in the management of chronic back pain. Further research investigating the effectiveness of both NMES and combined NMES/TENS seems warranted.

摘要

目的

对神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)以及联合应用NMES与经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)治疗慢性背痛进行初步研究。

设计

双盲、安慰剂对照、随机重复测量。

研究对象与地点

连续选取24例慢性背痛患者(16名女性和8名男性)作为样本,这些患者均在一家门诊疼痛诊所就诊(平均年龄51.67岁,平均疼痛持续时间3.83年)。所有治疗均在家中进行。

干预措施

受试者自行进行NMES、联合应用NMES/TENS、TENS以及安慰剂治疗。每种治疗持续2天,每天连续进行5小时,治疗之间间隔2天以尽量减少残留效应。

主要观察指标

通过治疗前与治疗后在当前疼痛强度(PPI)量表以及疼痛强度视觉模拟量表(VAS-I)上的差异来评估疼痛减轻情况。使用疼痛缓解视觉模拟量表(VAS-R)评估治疗后的疼痛缓解情况。

结果

联合治疗、NMES以及TENS在治疗前到治疗后均使疼痛强度显著降低,这通过PPI和VAS-I均得到了测量(p < .05)。联合治疗在疼痛减轻(p = .001,p = .016)以及疼痛缓解方面均优于安慰剂(p < .001)。联合治疗在疼痛减轻和疼痛缓解方面也优于TENS和NMES(p < .01)。NMES和TENS仅在疼痛缓解方面优于安慰剂(p < .001)。

结论

联合应用NMES/TENS治疗始终比安慰剂、TENS或NMES产生更大程度的疼痛减轻和疼痛缓解。单独使用NMES虽然效果较差,但确实产生了与TENS一样多的疼痛缓解。尽管是初步研究,但这种结果模式表明联合应用NMES/TENS可能是慢性背痛管理中有价值的辅助手段。对NMES以及联合应用NMES/TENS的有效性进行进一步研究似乎是有必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验