Cheng Y F, Huang T L, Chen C L, Sheen-Chen S M, Lui C C, Chen T Y, Lee T Y
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaoshiung Medical Center, Chang Gung Medical College and Technology, 123, Tai Pei Road, Kaohsiung Hsien, Taiwan, Republic of China.
World J Surg. 1997 Mar-Apr;21(3):297-300. doi: 10.1007/s002689900232.
The anatomic variations of the intrahepatic portal vein and bile duct were analyzed to evaluate the potential risk of left hepatectomy. A total of 210 cholangiograms and hepatic arterioportograms were performed in which the ramifications of the intrahepatic portal vein and bile duct were investigated. The orientation of the intrahepatic duct and portal vein were classified into five types. In 175 patients (83.33%), the intrahepatic portal vein and bile duct had the same anatomic classification. In 24 patients (11.43%), the right anterior or posterior intrahepatic duct drained into the left hepatic duct at the umbilical portion (type IV); there were only 15 patients (7.14%) whose portal veins fell into this category. All patients with type IV portal veins had type IV hepatic ducts, but there were 9/49 patients (18.36%) whose hepatic duct distribution belonged to type IV but their portal veins belonged to type II (6 cases) or III (3 cases). Without complete knowledge of the intrahepatic portal and biliary anatomy, insufficient portal perfusion and bile duct complications may result from the left hepatectomy operation. Preoperative portal vein evaluation or left portal vein clamping can provide significant information, but there are still 18.36% of patients where type IV biliary ducts were not detected in those with type II and III portal veins. Cholangiography is of paramount importance in these two groups of patients, as it can prevent inadvertent injury to the right intrahepatic ducts, which drain into the left intrahepatic duct. On the other hand, intraoperative ultrasonography is recommended to identify or exclude an aberrant portal vein if type VI biliary anatomy is detected during intraoperative cholangiography.
分析肝内门静脉和胆管的解剖变异,以评估左肝切除术的潜在风险。共进行了210例胆管造影和肝动脉门静脉造影,研究肝内门静脉和胆管的分支情况。肝内胆管和门静脉的走行分为五种类型。175例患者(83.33%)肝内门静脉和胆管具有相同的解剖分类。24例患者(11.43%)右前或右后肝内胆管在脐部汇入左肝管(IV型);门静脉属于此类型的仅15例患者(7.14%)。所有IV型门静脉患者均有IV型肝管,但49例肝管分布属于IV型的患者中有9例(18.36%)门静脉属于II型(6例)或III型(3例)。如果不完全了解肝内门静脉和胆管的解剖结构,左肝切除手术可能会导致门静脉灌注不足和胆管并发症。术前门静脉评估或左门静脉阻断可提供重要信息,但仍有18.36%的II型和III型门静脉患者未检测到IV型胆管。胆管造影对这两组患者至关重要,因为它可以防止无意中损伤汇入左肝管的右肝内胆管。另一方面,如果术中胆管造影发现VI型胆管解剖结构,建议术中超声检查以识别或排除异常门静脉。