• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在紧急情况下:无需征得同意。

In case of emergency: no need for consent.

作者信息

Brody B A, Katz J, Dula A

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 1997 Jan-Feb;27(1):7; discussion 7-12.

PMID:9017409
Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending its current informed consent regulations to permit harmonization of the Department of Health and Human Services' (DHHS) policies on emergency research and to reduce confusion on when such research can proceed without obtaining an individual subject's informed consent. This regulation provides a narrow exception to the requirement for obtaining and documenting informed consent from each human subject, or his or her legally authorized representative, prior to initiation of an experimental intervention. The exception would apply to a limited class of research activities involving human subjects who are in need of emergency medical intervention but who cannot give informed consent because of their life-threatening medical condition, and who do not have a legally authorized person to represent them. FDA is taking this action in response to growing concerns that current rules are making high quality acute care research activities difficult or impossible to carry out at a time when the need for such research is increasingly recognized.

摘要

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)正在修订其现行的知情同意规定,以实现卫生与公众服务部(DHHS)关于紧急研究政策的协调统一,并减少在何种情况下此类研究无需获得个体受试者的知情同意即可进行的混乱情况。本规定为在启动实验性干预之前从每位人类受试者或其法定授权代表处获得并记录知情同意的要求提供了一个狭义的例外。该例外适用于一类有限的涉及人类受试者的研究活动,这些受试者需要紧急医疗干预,但由于其危及生命的医疗状况而无法给予知情同意,且没有法定授权人员代表他们。FDA采取这一行动是为了回应越来越多的担忧,即当前的规则使得高质量的急性护理研究活动在对这类研究的需求日益得到认可的时候变得难以开展或无法进行。

相似文献

1
In case of emergency: no need for consent.在紧急情况下:无需征得同意。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1997 Jan-Feb;27(1):7; discussion 7-12.
2
Protection of human subjects; informed consent--FDA. Final rule.保护人类受试者;知情同意——美国食品药品监督管理局。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 1996 Oct 2;61(192):51498-533.
3
FDA revises informed consent regulations for emergency research.美国食品药品监督管理局修订紧急研究知情同意规定。
IRB. 1995 Sep-Dec;17(5-6):19-22.
4
The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.将支付作为对研究对象的益处这一矛盾案例。
IRB. 1989 Nov-Dec;11(6):1-3.
5
An update on the PEG-SOD study involving incompetent subjects: FDA permits an exception to informed consent requirements.聚乙二醇超氧化物歧化酶(PEG-SOD)对无行为能力受试者研究的最新情况:美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)允许免除知情同意要求。
IRB. 1994 Jan-Apr;16(1-2):16-8.
6
Emergency trials 'by popular consent.经公众同意进行的紧急试验。
New Sci. 1995 Nov 4;148(2002):6.
7
An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy.一位机构审查委员会成员对获得创新疗法的看法。
Albany Law Rev. 1994;57(3):559-81.
8
Cognitively impaired subjects. American College of Physicians.
Ann Intern Med. 1989 Nov 15;111(10):843-8.
9
Considering experimentation and elusive truth: informed consent made difficult.考虑到实验与难以捉摸的真相:知情同意变得困难。
Issues (St Louis Mo). 1992 Mar-Apr;7(2):1-8.
10
Nondevelopmental research on human subjects: the impact of the recommendations of the National Commission.关于人类受试者的非发育性研究:国家委员会建议的影响
Fed Proc. 1977 Sep;36(10):2359-64.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical ethics during armed conflicts: Dilemmas of a physician soldier.武装冲突期间的医学伦理:军医面临的困境
Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Oct;77(4):377-381. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.08.013. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
2
Issues with Consent in Stroke Patients.中风患者的同意问题。
West Indian Med J. 2014 Sep;63(5):510-3. doi: 10.7727/wimj.2013.134. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
3
Stroke patients' preferences and values about emergency research.中风患者对急诊研究的偏好和价值观。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Oct;31(10):608-11. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.010488.
4
The battering of informed consent.对知情同意的冲击
J Med Ethics. 2004 Dec;30(6):565-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.002949.
5
Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research.非裔美国人对参与医学研究的态度和信念。
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Sep;14(9):537-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.07048.x.