• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉注射氟哌利多在院前环境中的疗效。

The efficacy of intravenous droperidol in the prehospital setting.

作者信息

Rosen C L, Ratliff A F, Wolfe R E, Branney S W, Roe E J, Pons P T

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114, USA.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;15(1):13-7. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(96)00259-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0736-4679(96)00259-4
PMID:9017481
Abstract

Droperidol is used for sedating combative patients in the emergency department (ED). We performed a randomized, prospective, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy of droperidol in the management of combative patients in the prehospital setting. Forty-six patients intravenously received the contents of 2-cc vials of saline or droperidol (5 mg). Paramedics used a 5-point scale to quantify agitation levels prior to and 5 and 10 min after administration of the vials. Twenty-three patients received droperidol and 23 received saline. At 5 min, patients in the droperidol group were significantly less agitated than were patients in the saline group. At 10 min, this difference was highly significant. Eleven patients in the saline group (48%) required more sedation after arrival in the ED versus 3 patients (13%) in the droperidol group. We conclude that droperidol is effective in sedating combative patients in the prehospital setting.

摘要

氟哌利多用于急诊科对有攻击性的患者进行镇静。我们进行了一项随机、前瞻性、双盲研究,以评估氟哌利多在院前环境中对有攻击性患者的治疗效果。46例患者静脉注射2毫升生理盐水或氟哌利多(5毫克)。护理人员在注射前以及注射后5分钟和10分钟使用5分制量表对激动程度进行量化。23例患者接受氟哌利多治疗,23例接受生理盐水治疗。5分钟时,氟哌利多组患者的激动程度明显低于生理盐水组患者。10分钟时,这种差异非常显著。生理盐水组11例患者(48%)在到达急诊科后需要更多镇静,而氟哌利多组为3例患者(13%)。我们得出结论,氟哌利多在院前环境中对有攻击性的患者进行镇静是有效的。

相似文献

1
The efficacy of intravenous droperidol in the prehospital setting.静脉注射氟哌利多在院前环境中的疗效。
J Emerg Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;15(1):13-7. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(96)00259-4.
2
Management of acute undifferentiated agitation in the emergency department: a randomized double-blind trial of droperidol, ziprasidone, and midazolam.急诊科急性未分化躁动的管理:氟哌利多、齐拉西酮和咪达唑仑的随机双盲试验
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Dec;12(12):1167-72. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.07.017. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
3
Prehospital Agitation and Sedation Trial (PhAST): A Randomized Control Trial of Intramuscular Haloperidol versus Intramuscular Midazolam for the Sedation of the Agitated or Violent Patient in the Prehospital Environment.院前躁动与镇静试验(PhAST):一项关于肌肉注射氟哌啶醇与肌肉注射咪达唑仑用于院前环境中躁动或暴力患者镇静的随机对照试验。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Oct;30(5):491-5. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15004999. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
4
Comparison of droperidol and haloperidol for use by paramedics: assessment of safety and effectiveness.护理人员使用氟哌利多和氟哌啶醇的比较:安全性和有效性评估。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):375-80. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.864353. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
5
Intravenous droperidol or olanzapine as an adjunct to midazolam for the acutely agitated patient: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.静脉注射氟哌利多或奥氮平作为苯二氮䓬类药物辅助治疗急性激越患者的效果:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;61(1):72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.07.118. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
6
Discontinuation of droperidol for the control of acutely agitated out-of-hospital patients.停用氟哌利多以控制急性躁动的院外患者。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005 Jan-Mar;9(1):44-8. doi: 10.1080/10903120590891723.
7
Chemical restraint for the agitated patient in the emergency department: lorazepam versus droperidol.
J Emerg Med. 1998 Jul-Aug;16(4):567-73. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(98)00045-6.
8
Randomized clinical trial comparing intravenous midazolam and droperidol for sedation of the acutely agitated patient in the emergency department.比较静脉注射咪达唑仑和氟哌利多用于急诊科急性躁动患者镇静的随机临床试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;47(1):61-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.07.003. Epub 2005 Aug 18.
9
Midazolam-Droperidol, Droperidol, or Olanzapine for Acute Agitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.咪达唑仑-氟哌利多、氟哌利多或奥氮平用于急性躁动:一项随机临床试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;69(3):318-326.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.07.033. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
10
Prospective study of haloperidol plus lorazepam versus droperidol plus midazolam for the treatment of acute agitation in the emergency department.急诊科使用氟哌啶醇加劳拉西泮与氟哌利多加咪达唑仑治疗急性躁动的前瞻性研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 May;55:76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.042. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Chemical sedation of excited delirium in the pre-hospital setting.院前环境中兴奋谵妄的化学镇静
Br Paramed J. 2020 Mar 1;4(4):34-39. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2020.12.4.4.34.
2
Organisational interventions for preventing and minimising aggression directed towards healthcare workers by patients and patient advocates.预防和尽量减少患者及患者支持者对医护人员的攻击行为的组织干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 29;4(4):CD012662. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012662.pub2.
3
Brazilian guidelines for the management of psychomotor agitation. Part 2. Pharmacological approach.
巴西精神运动性激越管理指南。第 2 部分。药物治疗方法。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2019 Jul-Aug;41(4):324-335. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2018-0177. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
4
Droperidol for psychosis-induced aggression or agitation.氟哌利多用于治疗精神病性激越或激惹。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 15;12(12):CD002830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002830.pub3.
5
Comparison of droperidol and haloperidol for use by paramedics: assessment of safety and effectiveness.护理人员使用氟哌利多和氟哌啶醇的比较:安全性和有效性评估。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):375-80. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.864353. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
6
An intoxicated man with facial trauma.
Intern Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;5(2):145-9. doi: 10.1007/s11739-010-0353-1. Epub 2010 Mar 13.
7
Pharmacological control of acute agitation: focus on intramuscular preparations.急性激越的药物控制:聚焦于肌肉注射制剂
CNS Drugs. 2008;22(3):199-212. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200822030-00002.
8
Searching for the evidence in pre-hospital care: a review of randomised controlled trials. On behalf of the Ambulance Response Time Sub-Group of the National Ambulance Advisory Committee.在院前急救中寻找证据:随机对照试验综述。代表国家救护车咨询委员会救护车反应时间分组。
J Accid Emerg Med. 1999 Jan;16(1):18-23. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.1.18.