Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死患者按性别划分的治疗程序使用、院内死亡率及疾病严重程度差异:答案是否受数据来源及严重程度测量方法的影响?

Differences in procedure use, in-hospital mortality, and illness severity by gender for acute myocardial infarction patients: are answers affected by data source and severity measure?

作者信息

Iezzoni L I, Ash A S, Shwartz M, Mackiernan Y D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 1997 Feb;35(2):158-71. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199702000-00006.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

According to some studies, women with heart disease receive fewer procedures and have higher in-hospital death rates than men. These studies vary by data source (hospital discharge abstract versus detailed clinical information) and severity measurement methods. The authors examined whether evaluations of gender differences for acute myocardial infarction patients vary by data source and severity measure.

METHODS

The authors considered 10 severity measures: four using clinical medical record data and six using discharge abstracts (diagnosis and procedure codes). The authors studied all 14,083 patients admitted in 1991 for acute myocardial infarction to 100 hospitals nationwide, examining in-hospital death and use of coronary angiography, coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for death and procedure use for women compared with men, controlling for age and each of the severity scores.

RESULTS

After adjusting only for age, women were significantly more likely than men to die and less likely to receive CABG and coronary angiography. Severity measures provided different assessments of whether women were sicker than men; for all cases, clinical data-based MedisGroups rated women's severity compared with men's, whereas four code-based severity measures viewed women as sicker. After adjusting for severity and age, women were significantly more likely than men to die in-hospital and less likely to receive coronary angiography and CABG; women and men had relatively equal adjusted odds ratios of receiving PTCA. Odds ratios reflecting gender differences in procedure use and death rates were similar across severity measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparisons of severity-adjusted in-hospital death rates and invasive procedure use between men and women yielded similar findings regardless of data source and severity measure.

摘要

目的

根据一些研究,患有心脏病的女性接受的治疗程序较少,且住院死亡率高于男性。这些研究因数据来源(医院出院摘要与详细临床信息)和严重程度测量方法而异。作者研究了急性心肌梗死患者性别差异的评估是否因数据来源和严重程度测量方法而有所不同。

方法

作者考虑了10种严重程度测量方法:4种使用临床病历数据,6种使用出院摘要(诊断和程序代码)。作者研究了1991年全国100家医院收治的所有14083例急性心肌梗死患者,考察了住院死亡率以及冠状动脉造影、冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术(PTCA)的使用情况。使用逻辑回归计算女性与男性相比的死亡几率和治疗程序使用几率,并控制年龄和每种严重程度评分。

结果

仅调整年龄后,女性比男性死亡的可能性显著更高,接受CABG和冠状动脉造影的可能性更低。严重程度测量方法对女性是否比男性病情更严重提供了不同的评估;对于所有病例,基于临床数据的MedisGroups对女性与男性的严重程度进行了评级,而4种基于代码的严重程度测量方法则认为女性病情更严重。在调整严重程度和年龄后,女性在住院期间死亡的可能性显著高于男性,接受冠状动脉造影和CABG的可能性更低;女性和男性接受PTCA的调整后几率相对相等。反映治疗程序使用和死亡率性别差异的几率在不同严重程度测量方法中相似。

结论

无论数据来源和严重程度测量方法如何,对男性和女性经严重程度调整后的住院死亡率和侵入性治疗程序使用情况进行比较,结果相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验