Suppr超能文献

[机械消化系统缝合装置]

[Mechanical digestive system suturing devices].

作者信息

Popovici A, Popescu I, Ionescu M I, Vasilescu C, Mitulescu G, Iliescu C A

机构信息

Clinica de chirurgie generală, Spitalul Clinic Fundeni, Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie Carol Davila, Bucureşti.

出版信息

Chirurgia (Bucur). 1996 May-Jun;45(3):101-10.

PMID:9019262
Abstract

Between 1994 (December)-1996 (May) 150 patients have been operated on using one or many stapling devices. The staplers disposable to us were the "Linear Cutter" or GIA (Gastrointestinal Anastomosis), "Linear Stapler" (TA) and "Intraluminal Circular Stapler" or EEA (end-to-end anastomosis) types, produced by ETHICON (Johnson and Johnson Ltd. Company). The principles operations performed were various digestive resections, intervisceralis anastomosis and interventions of reconstructions (in oesophagus surgery, ileal pouch etc.). The advantages of staplers applications are: a) the reduction of the time of operation, of the anesthesia, of the blood loss; b) a soft manipulation of the tissues; c) a smaller inflammatory reaction and the prevention of intraoperative septic contamination and d) a better and faster take back of the functionality of the anastomosis. There were only 4 intraoperative haemorrhages easy controllable. Postoperative complications: a) 3 haemorrhages medically treated; b) immediate leakage 1 patient after colorectoanastomosis, treated by Hartman colostomy; precocious, 7 patients and after 4-6 month, 2 patients. Corrective iterative interventions were necessary only in 5 patients. The operative mortality-1 patient, the cause of death being a bronhopneumonia after a radical oesophagectomy with oesophagoplasty (oesophageal cancer). There was not postoperative mortality depending of stapling application. We don't observed late postoperative complications like stenosis of various anastomosis, quoted in the literature, because the time of following of our 150 patients is too short (maximum 18 months). The conclusions are that the stapling devices are a real surgical progress with the conditions of a correct indication and adequate tactics and operative technique. The economical effort is justified and entirely compensated by the major benefits obtained for the patients.

摘要

1994年12月至1996年5月期间,150例患者接受了使用一种或多种吻合器的手术。我们使用的一次性吻合器为“线性切割器”或GIA(胃肠吻合器)、“线性吻合器”(TA)以及“腔内圆形吻合器”或EEA(端端吻合器),由ETHICON公司(强生有限公司)生产。所进行的主要手术操作包括各种消化道切除术、内脏间吻合术以及重建手术(如食管手术、回肠袋手术等)。吻合器应用的优点包括:a)缩短手术时间、麻醉时间和减少出血量;b)对组织的操作轻柔;c)炎症反应较小,预防术中感染污染;d)吻合口功能恢复更好更快。术中仅发生4例易于控制的出血。术后并发症:a)3例出血经药物治疗;b)结直肠吻合术后1例立即发生渗漏,行哈特曼结肠造口术治疗;早期渗漏7例,4 - 6个月后渗漏2例。仅5例患者需要进行纠正性反复干预。手术死亡1例,死亡原因是食管癌根治性食管切除加食管成形术后发生支气管肺炎。未观察到因使用吻合器而导致的术后死亡。由于对150例患者的随访时间过短(最长18个月),我们未观察到文献中提到的各种吻合口狭窄等术后晚期并发症。结论是,在正确的适应证、适当的策略和手术技术条件下,吻合器是一项真正的外科进展。所付出的经济成本是合理的,并且患者所获得的主要益处完全弥补了这一成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验