Baranowska-George T
Katedry Okulistyki z Klinika i Zakladem Patofizjologil Narzadu Wzroku Pomorskiej AM w Szczecinie.
Klin Oczna. 1996 Mar;98(3):253-6.
The author presents an outline of strabology development in Poland since the 50s. Original ideas of Polish authors are provided, with three schools of treating strabismus existing in this country being discussed. In the final part the author highlights the differences between the method used in Szczecin and that in other centres implementing previous principles. The lack of consensus among the supporters of different methods is attributed to variability in the interpretation concerning the inception of mono- and binocular visual sensations, both in physiology and squinting subjects. The followers of the Szczecin School rely on Starkiewicz's theory which elucidates the genesis of the above-mentioned processes on the grounds of the reflex connections that arise between cortical centres of vision and all others in cerebral cortex, particularly with centres of kinetics and perception. Physicians proceeding with the treatment by old methods ascribe in these processes a great role to retinas of both eyes and ocular muscles without any explanation with regard to connections involving cerebral cortex.
作者概述了自50年代以来波兰斜视学的发展。介绍了波兰作者的原创观点，并讨论了该国存在的三种斜视治疗学派。在最后一部分，作者强调了什切青采用的方法与其他遵循先前原则的中心所采用方法之间的差异。不同方法的支持者之间缺乏共识归因于在生理学和斜视患者中，关于单眼和双眼视觉感觉起始的解释存在差异。什切青学派的追随者依赖斯塔基维茨的理论，该理论基于视觉皮层中枢与大脑皮层中所有其他中枢（特别是与运动和感知中枢）之间产生的反射联系来阐明上述过程的起源。采用旧方法进行治疗的医生在这些过程中赋予双眼视网膜和眼肌很大作用，而未对涉及大脑皮层的联系作出任何解释。
