Hu Y P, Chapey C, Robert J
Institut Bergonié and University of Bordeoux II, France.
Cancer Lett. 1996 Dec 3;109(1-2):203-9. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(96)04454-0.
Using three different cell lines exhibiting the MDR phenotype, we have studied the ability of eight different modulators to restore doxorubicin intracellular accumulation and to inhibit azidopine binding to membrane extracts. One cell line was of human origin (KB VI) and two of murine origin, overexpressing two different isoforms of the mdrl gene (C6 IV and C6 0.5). The modulators were distributed in different drug classes: cyclosporine A and PSC-833, quinine and quinidine, nifedipine and nicardipine, and verapamil and S-9788. We observed that there was no strict parallelism between restoration of doxorubicin intracellular accumulation and inhibition of azidopine binding. However, when considering separately each group of drugs, it appeared that the most potent drug in inhibiting azidopine labelling of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) was also the most potent in restoring doxorubicin accumulation. This indicates that azidopine binding cannot be used as a general screening test for the identification of new modulators, but rather at the level of the selection of potent analogues within a chemical family. The three cell lines behaved similarly, indicating that the structural diversity of P-pgs did not influence the efficiency and binding of modulators.
利用三种呈现多药耐药(MDR)表型的不同细胞系,我们研究了八种不同调节剂恢复阿霉素细胞内蓄积以及抑制叠氮平与膜提取物结合的能力。一种细胞系源自人类(KB VI),两种源自小鼠,它们过表达mdrl基因的两种不同亚型(C6 IV和C6 0.5)。这些调节剂分布于不同的药物类别:环孢素A和PSC - 833、奎宁和奎尼丁、硝苯地平和尼卡地平、维拉帕米和S - 9788。我们观察到,阿霉素细胞内蓄积的恢复与叠氮平结合的抑制之间不存在严格的平行关系。然而,当分别考虑每组药物时,似乎抑制P - 糖蛋白(P - gp)叠氮平标记最有效的药物在恢复阿霉素蓄积方面也最有效。这表明叠氮平结合不能用作鉴定新调节剂的常规筛选试验,而更适用于在化学家族内选择强效类似物的层面。这三种细胞系表现相似,表明P - pgs的结构多样性不影响调节剂的效率和结合。