Moon C S, Zhang Z W, Shimbo S, Hokimoto S, Shimazaki K, Saito T, Shimizu A, Imai Y, Watanabe T, Ikeda M
Department of Public Health, Kyoto University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
J Trace Elem Med Biol. 1996 Dec;10(4):237-44. doi: 10.1016/S0946-672X(96)80041-1.
In order to make quantitative comparison between food composition table-based estimates and instrumental measures by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), total food duplicates were collected from 232 adult women in 10 study regions in 9 Prefectures in Japan. Daily dietary intake of 5 elements, sodium (Na), potassium (K), phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca) and iron (Fe), were estimated from the weights of food items in each duplicate by use of food composition tables. Parallel to this the intakes were measured by wet-ashing of food duplicate homogenates followed by ICP-AES analysis. Because the emission intensity of K was significantly modified by Na co-present at various concentrations, K was measured after Na concentration was reduced to the value 150 mg/L by dilution. The comparison of the two sets of the results, the estimated values and the measured values, showed that the estimated values were significantly larger than the measured values in the cases of Na, K, Ca and P (the ratio of the estimated to the measured values: 118% for Na, 115% for K, 109% for Ca; and 130% for Fe), whereas the two values essentially agreed with each other in the case of P (ratio: 93%). The differences were too large for any nutritional evaluation to be made when the method of Bland and Altman is applied. The significance of the differences in relation to nutritional evaluation of element intake is discussed.
为了对基于食物成分表的估计值与电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱法(ICP - AES)的仪器测量值进行定量比较,从日本9个县10个研究区域的232名成年女性中收集了食物总复制品。通过使用食物成分表,根据每个复制品中食物项目的重量估算了钠(Na)、钾(K)、磷(P)、钙(Ca)和铁(Fe)这5种元素的每日膳食摄入量。与此同时,通过对食物复制品匀浆进行湿灰化,然后进行ICP - AES分析来测量摄入量。由于不同浓度共存的钠会显著改变钾的发射强度,因此在通过稀释将钠浓度降至150 mg/L后测量钾。对两组结果(估计值和测量值)的比较表明,在钠、钾、钙和磷的情况下,估计值显著大于测量值(估计值与测量值的比率:钠为118%,钾为115%,钙为109%;铁为130%),而在磷的情况下,这两个值基本一致(比率:93%)。当应用布兰德 - 奥特曼方法时,差异太大以至于无法进行任何营养评估。讨论了这些差异在元素摄入量营养评估方面的意义。