Suppr超能文献

筛查铅暴露儿童:毛细血管血铅手指采血检测的评估

Screening children exposed to lead: an assessment of the capillary blood lead fingerstick test.

作者信息

Parsons P J, Reilly A A, Esernio-Jenssen D

机构信息

Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany 12201-0509, USA.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1997 Feb;43(2):302-11.

PMID:9023133
Abstract

We describe results of a 3-year study in which 499 paired venous and capillary blood specimens, collected by fingerstick on the same day, were analyzed for lead (BPb) and erythrocyte protoporphyrin (EP). False-positive rates (FPRs) and the proportion of false positives were calculated at four BPb thresholds. At the 100 microg/L threshold, the FPR for all data was 13%, but the proportion of false positives was only 5%. The log ratios of capillary-to-venous BPb data indicate that, with the exception of eight outliers, two subpopulations exist that follow a log-normal distribution. These two subpopulations, the "core" (n = 303) and "shifted" (n = 188) groups, on average generated a positive bias at 100 microg/L BPb of 8.6% and 30.3%, respectively. The log ratios of capillary-to-venous EP data followed a normal distribution, indicating that capillary EP is not statistically different from venous EP.

摘要

我们描述了一项为期3年的研究结果,该研究中对同一天通过手指采血采集的499对静脉血和毛细血管血标本进行了铅(BPb)和红细胞原卟啉(EP)分析。在四个BPb阈值下计算了假阳性率(FPR)和假阳性比例。在100μg/L阈值时,所有数据的FPR为13%,但假阳性比例仅为5%。毛细血管与静脉BPb数据的对数比表明,除了8个异常值外,存在两个遵循对数正态分布的亚群。这两个亚群,即“核心”组(n = 303)和“偏移”组(n = 188),在BPb为100μg/L时平均产生的正偏差分别为8.6%和30.3%。毛细血管与静脉EP数据的对数比呈正态分布,表明毛细血管EP与静脉EP在统计学上无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验