Mayhew T M
Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, UK.
J Neurocytol. 1996 Dec;25(12):793-804. doi: 10.1007/BF02284842.
After almost 40 years, there is still no consensus on criteria for identifying different types of synapse seen in electron microscopical thin sections or on methods for counting them unbiasedly in 3D. This review proposes a procedure which meets these aims and could be adopted as a standard best-practice sampling and counting convention. It deals exclusively with unbiased stereological methods for counting particles in 3D space because these are efficient and applicable to arbitrary particles regardless of their size, shape and orientation. Methods based on individual sections are excluded because arbitrary particles cannot be counted unbiasedly with such sections. Model-based methods (e.g. treating synaptic membrane densities as circular disks) are excluded because they are not unbiased in general and now have limited (mainly historical) interest only. For unbiased counting, the absolute minimum requirement is a pair of parallel sections (dissector). The following protocol is recommended for future studies on synapse number: (1) use para(membrane) densities as synaptic counting units, (2) do not qualify definition of the counting unit by reference to a minimum number of synaptic vesicle profiles, (3) sample and count synapses unbiasedly using the dissector, and (4) in preference convert number per volume into absolute number or, in this is not possible, estimate a synapse-to-neuron ratio.
近40年来,对于在电子显微镜薄切片中识别不同类型突触的标准,以及在三维空间中无偏计数突触的方法,仍未达成共识。本综述提出了一种满足这些目标的程序,可作为标准的最佳实践抽样和计数惯例采用。它专门涉及在三维空间中对颗粒进行计数的无偏体视学方法,因为这些方法高效且适用于任意颗粒,无论其大小、形状和方向如何。基于单个切片的方法被排除在外,因为用这样的切片无法对任意颗粒进行无偏计数。基于模型的方法(例如将突触膜密度视为圆盘)也被排除在外,因为它们一般不是无偏的,现在仅具有有限的(主要是历史的)意义。对于无偏计数,绝对最低要求是一对平行切片(间隔物)。建议未来关于突触数量的研究采用以下方案:(1)使用(膜)密度作为突触计数单位,(2)不通过参考突触小泡轮廓的最小数量来限定计数单位的定义,(3)使用间隔物对突触进行无偏抽样和计数,(4)优先将每体积的数量转换为绝对数量,或者在不可能的情况下,估计突触与神经元的比例。