• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一氧化氮对大鼠颈内动脉注射高渗甘露醇所致血脑屏障破坏的影响。

Effects of nitric oxide on blood-brain barrier disruption caused by intracarotid injection of hyperosmolar mannitol in rats.

作者信息

Chi O Z, Chang Q, Wang G, Weiss H R

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick 08901-1977, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1997 Feb;84(2):370-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199702000-00024.

DOI:10.1097/00000539-199702000-00024
PMID:9024031
Abstract

We performed this study to evaluate the effects of changing the level of nitric oxide (NO) on disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) by hyperosmolar mannitol. Under isoflurane anesthesia, control rats (control group, n = 6) were given infusions with 25% mannitol into the internal carotid artery before measuring the transfer coefficient (Ki) of 14C-alpha-aminoisobutyric acid (14C-AIB). In the CAS group (n = 6), [3-(cis-2,6-dimethyl piperidino)-sydnonimine] (CAS 754), a NO donor, was injected to decrease the mean arterial pressure (MAP) to 55 mm Hg and in the L-NAME group (n = 6), NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a NO synthase inhibitor, was injected before administering mannitol. In additional control animals (control + P group, n = 6) and additional CAS 754-treated animals (CAS + P group, n = 6), phenylephrine was infused to keep MAP at 130 mm Hg during the experimental period. In the control group, with mannitol injection, the Ki of the ipsilateral cortex (IC) where mannitol was injected increased to 4.3 times that of the contralateral cortex (CC) (17.2 +/- 2.9 vs 4.0 +/- 2.6 microliters.g-1.min.1). Without blood pressure control, the Ki of the IC of the CAS group (7.0 +/- 4.5) was lower and that of the L-NAME group (26.2 +/- 12.7) was higher than that of the control animals. At the same MAP, the Ki of the IC of the CAS + P group (9.6 +/- 3.1) was significantly lower than that of the control + P group (21.3 +/- 14.5) or that of the L-NAME group. There was no significant difference in the Ki of the IC between the control + P and the L-NAME groups. In conclusion, L-NAME worsened BBB disruption induced by hyperosmolar solution, which may be due to the pressure effect of L-NAME. CAS 754 was effective in attenuating disruption of the BBB caused by hyperosmolar mannitol. This effect is apparently not due to decreased MAP.

摘要

我们进行这项研究以评估改变一氧化氮(NO)水平对高渗甘露醇破坏血脑屏障(BBB)的影响。在异氟烷麻醉下,在测量14C-α-氨基异丁酸(14C-AIB)的转运系数(Ki)之前,向对照大鼠(对照组,n = 6)的颈内动脉输注25%甘露醇。在CAS组(n = 6)中,注射NO供体[3 -(顺式-2,6-二甲基哌啶基)-西多胺](CAS 754)以将平均动脉压(MAP)降至55 mmHg,在L-NAME组(n = 6)中,在给予甘露醇之前注射NO合酶抑制剂NG-硝基-L-精氨酸甲酯(L-NAME)。在另外的对照动物(对照 + P组,n = 6)和另外的经CAS 754处理的动物(CAS + P组,n = 6)中,在实验期间输注去氧肾上腺素以将MAP维持在130 mmHg。在对照组中,注射甘露醇后,注射甘露醇侧的同侧皮质(IC)的Ki增加至对侧皮质(CC)的4.3倍(17.2±2.9对4.0±2.6微升·克-1·分钟-1)。在未控制血压的情况下,CAS组IC的Ki(7.0±4.5)较低,L-NAME组IC的Ki(26.2±12.7)高于对照动物。在相同的MAP下,CAS + P组IC的Ki(9.6±3.1)显著低于对照 + P组(21.3±14.5)或L-NAME组。对照 + P组和L-NAME组IC的Ki之间无显著差异。总之,L-NAME使高渗溶液诱导的BBB破坏恶化,这可能归因于L-NAME的压力效应。CAS 754可有效减轻高渗甘露醇引起的BBB破坏。这种作用显然不是由于MAP降低所致。

相似文献

1
Effects of nitric oxide on blood-brain barrier disruption caused by intracarotid injection of hyperosmolar mannitol in rats.一氧化氮对大鼠颈内动脉注射高渗甘露醇所致血脑屏障破坏的影响。
Anesth Analg. 1997 Feb;84(2):370-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199702000-00024.
2
The effects of pentobarbital on blood-brain barrier disruption caused by intracarotid injection of hyperosmolar mannitol in rats.戊巴比妥对大鼠颈内动脉注射高渗甘露醇所致血脑屏障破坏的影响。
Anesth Analg. 1998 Jun;86(6):1230-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199806000-00018.
3
Effects of VEGF and nitric oxide synthase inhibition on blood-brain barrier disruption in the ischemic and non-ischemic cerebral cortex.血管内皮生长因子和一氧化氮合酶抑制对缺血性和非缺血性大脑皮质血脑屏障破坏的影响。
Neurol Res. 2005 Dec;27(8):864-8. doi: 10.1179/016164105X49418.
4
Hydroxyethyl starch solution attenuates blood-brain barrier disruption caused by intracarotid injection of hyperosmolar mannitol in rats.羟乙基淀粉溶液可减轻大鼠颈内动脉注射高渗甘露醇所致的血脑屏障破坏。
Anesth Analg. 1996 Aug;83(2):336-41. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199608000-00023.
5
The effects of morphine on blood-brain barrier disruption caused by intracarotid injection of hyperosmolar mannitol in rats.吗啡对大鼠颈内动脉注射高渗甘露醇所致血脑屏障破坏的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2000 Mar;90(3):603-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200003000-00019.
6
Effects of hyperosmolar mannitol on regional oxygen supply and consumption in the newborn pig.高渗甘露醇对新生猪局部氧供应和氧消耗的影响。
Neurol Res. 1997 Apr;19(2):204-10. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1997.11740796.
7
The effect of the nitric oxide synthesis inhibitor L-NAME on amitriptyline-induced hypotension in rats.一氧化氮合成抑制剂L-精氨酸甲酯(L-NAME)对大鼠阿米替林诱导的低血压的影响。
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2002;40(2):121-7. doi: 10.1081/clt-120004399.
8
The role of nitric oxide in the cerebrovascular response to hypercapnia.一氧化氮在脑血管对高碳酸血症反应中的作用。
Anesth Analg. 1997 Feb;84(2):363-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199702000-00023.
9
Modulation of Hyperosmotic and Immune-Induced Disruption of the Blood-Brain Barrier by the Nitric Oxide System.一氧化氮系统对高渗及免疫诱导的血脑屏障破坏的调节作用
Neuroimmunomodulation. 2016;23(1):1-7. doi: 10.1159/000441948. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
10
Effects of inhibition of nitric oxide synthase on blood-brain barrier transport in focal cerebral ischemia.
Pharmacology. 1994 Jun;48(6):367-73. doi: 10.1159/000139202.

引用本文的文献

1
Release of Matrix Metalloproteinases-2 and 9 by S-Nitrosylated Caveolin-1 Contributes to Degradation of Extracellular Matrix in tPA-Treated Hypoxic Endothelial Cells.S-亚硝基化的小窝蛋白-1释放基质金属蛋白酶-2和9有助于组织型纤溶酶原激活剂处理的缺氧内皮细胞中细胞外基质的降解。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 16;11(2):e0149269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149269. eCollection 2016.
2
Osmotic opening of the blood-brain barrier: principles, mechanism, and therapeutic applications.血脑屏障的渗透性开放:原理、机制及治疗应用
Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2000 Apr;20(2):217-30. doi: 10.1023/a:1007049806660.