Baumann G, Hader O
I. Medizinische Klinik Kardiologie-Angiologie-Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Charité Humboldt-Universität Berlin.
Z Kardiol. 1996;85 Suppl 4:9-19.
Severe congestive heart failure and cardiogenic shock don't resemble a homogeneous clinical picture, but a syndrome that is based on very different etiologies. What all the etiologies have in common is the inadequate peripheral O2-supply to essential organs with or without signs of severe pulmonary congestion up to pulmonary edema. For prognosis and therapy is a fast diagnostical clarification of the causes crucial. The therapeutical procedure for the various etiologies may be diametrically opposed. For the therapy is it also dicisive to distinguish between acute myocardial failure, e.g. acute myocardial infarction, and the development of myocardial failure from a longer existing consistent congestive heart failure (cardiomyopathy). Whenever possible, next to symptomatically therapy of cardiogenic shock the basic conditions of the disease should be cured (e.g., PTCA, lysis with acute myocardial infarction, lysis in acute pulmonary embolism). In myogenic cardiogenic shock the use of positive-inotropic substances with and without simultaneous vasodilatory effects, if necessary in combination with other vasodilators, may be life-saving. Up until now there still doesn't exist an alternative to the catecholamines in the acute phase, initially they should be used as a first-line-therapy to stabilize the hemodynamics. The insertion of a Swan-Ganz-catheter for invasive therapy-monitoring, especially for the regulation of the therapy is a "condition sine qua non" for every patient with unstable hemodynamics. Because of the prompt beta-receptor-down-regulation during shock, caused by endogenous catecholamines, successful therapy with exogenous catecholamines is limited (adrenaline, dopamine, dobutamine), on account of the acceleration and intensification of the beta-receptor-down-regulation process. Possible beta-receptor independent alternatives are beta 2-agonists (dopexamine), PDE-III-inhibitors (amrinone, milrinone, enoximone) as well as H2-receptor agonists (impromidine, arpromidine) and finally the calcium-sensitisers (pimobendane). First results give rise to optimism to effectively reduce the mortality of congestive heart failure. The combination of these new pharmacological possibilities with interventional transcutaneous applicable assist-systems (aortic counterpulsationpump IABP, hemopump, transcutaneous heart-lung-machine) as well as the transitory application of an artificial heart (Novacor) can possibly increase the success of these therapeutic strategies. So far there are no convincing results shown in the world literature.
严重充血性心力衰竭和心源性休克并非呈现单一的临床表现,而是一种基于多种不同病因的综合征。所有病因的共同之处在于,重要器官的外周氧供应不足,伴有或不伴有严重肺充血直至肺水肿的迹象。对于预后和治疗而言,快速明确病因至关重要。针对各种病因的治疗方法可能截然相反。对于治疗来说,区分急性心肌衰竭(如急性心肌梗死)和由长期存在的持续性充血性心力衰竭(心肌病)发展而来的心肌衰竭也很关键。只要有可能,除了对症治疗心源性休克外,还应治愈疾病的基本病因(如急性心肌梗死时进行经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术、溶栓治疗,急性肺栓塞时进行溶栓治疗)。在肌源性心源性休克中,使用具有或不具有同时扩张血管作用的正性肌力药物,必要时与其他血管扩张剂联合使用,可能挽救生命。到目前为止,在急性期,儿茶酚胺仍然没有替代药物,最初应将其用作一线治疗以稳定血流动力学。对于每一位血流动力学不稳定的患者,插入Swan - Ganz导管进行有创治疗监测,特别是用于调整治疗,是“必不可少的条件”。由于休克期间内源性儿茶酚胺导致β受体迅速下调,外源性儿茶酚胺(肾上腺素、多巴胺、多巴酚丁胺)的成功治疗受到限制,因为这会加速和加剧β受体下调过程。可能的β受体非依赖性替代药物包括β2激动剂(多培沙明)、磷酸二酯酶III抑制剂(氨力农、米力农、依诺昔酮)以及H2受体激动剂(英普咪定、阿普咪定),最后还有钙敏化剂(匹莫苯丹)。初步结果让人对有效降低充血性心力衰竭的死亡率感到乐观。将这些新的药理学方法与介入性经皮适用辅助系统(主动脉反搏泵IABP、血泵、经皮心肺机)以及人工心脏(诺瓦科尔)的临时应用相结合,可能会提高这些治疗策略的成功率。到目前为止,世界文献中尚未显示出令人信服的结果。