Family dynamics and children in medical research.
作者信息
Gordon V M, Bonkovsky F O
机构信息
National Institute of Drug Research at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
出版信息
J Clin Ethics. 1996 Winter;7(4):349-54; discussion 362-4.
PMID:9029336
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Family dynamics and children in medical research.医学研究中的家庭动态与儿童
J Clin Ethics. 1996 Winter;7(4):349-54; discussion 362-4.
2
Audience and authority: the story in front of the story.受众与权威性：故事背后的故事。
J Clin Ethics. 1996 Winter;7(4):355-61.
3
4
Law would remove ability of institutional review boards to waive written consent.法律将取消机构审查委员会放弃书面同意的能力。
Hum Res Rep. 1996 Aug;11(8):1-2.
5
Bill requires express written consent, not "passive consent.法案要求明确的书面同意，而非“被动同意”。
Hum Res Rep. 1995 Jul;10(7):6.
6
Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act.《涉及人类受试者的医学研究法案》
Bull Med Ethics. 1999 Nov;No. 152:13-8.
7
Commentary on "Family dynamics and children in medical research.关于“医学研究中的家庭动态与儿童”的评论
J Clin Ethics. 1996 Winter;7(4):362-4.
8
Going beyond parents and institutional review boards in protecting children involved in nontherapeutic research.超越父母和机构审查委员会，保护参与非治疗性研究的儿童。
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev. 2003 Spring;33(2):251-94.
9
Research with children.对儿童的研究。
Am J Law Med. 1998;24(2-3):213-44.
10
Constraints on experimentation: protecting children to death.实验的限制：将儿童保护致死。
Yale Law Policy Rev. 1988;6(1):137-56.
引用本文的文献
1
Comparisons of adolescent and parent willingness to participate in minimal and above-minimal risk pediatric asthma research protocols.青少年与家长参与最低风险及高于最低风险的儿科哮喘研究方案的意愿比较。
J Adolesc Health. 2005 Sep;37(3):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.09.026.
Zotero 插件