Mariathasan E A, Stolerman I P, White J A
Section of Behavioural Pharmacology, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997 Jan 10;44(1):31-4. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(96)01318-x.
It has been suggested that use of the AND-OR training method may be associated with an enhancement of the pharmacological specificity of discriminations based on mixture of drugs. Rats were trained to discriminate a mixture of nicotine (0.4 mg/kg s.c.) plus midazolam (0.2 mg/kg s.c.) from saline (AND-discrimination, n = 8) or to discriminate the mixture from either drug alone (AND-OR discrimination, n = 6). The studies used two-lever operant procedures with food reinforcers presented on a tandem schedule. After discriminations were acquired to 80% accuracy, the nicotine antagonist mecamylamine (0.03 1.0 mg/kg s.c.) and the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil (0.32 10 mg kg i.p.) were tested on the response to the mixture of nicotine plus midazolam. The antagonist effects of either mecamylamine or flumazenil given alone were more marked in rats trained under the AND-OR procedure than in rats trained on the AND-discrimination. Similarly, the antagonist effects of mixtures of mecamylamine plus flumazenil were much more potent under the AND-OR than under the AND-discrimination procedure. The AND-OR method reduced the dose of the antagonist mixture needed to produce complete block by a factor of about 10, as compared with the AND-discrimination. These striking differences in sensitivity to antagonists support the view that AND-OR or related procedures may enhance the pharmacological specificity of complex drug discriminations.
有人提出,使用“与或”训练方法可能与基于药物混合物的辨别药理特异性增强有关。将大鼠训练为从生理盐水(“与”辨别,n = 8)中辨别出尼古丁(0.4毫克/千克皮下注射)加咪达唑仑(0.2毫克/千克皮下注射)的混合物,或从单独的任何一种药物中辨别出该混合物(“与或”辨别,n = 6)。这些研究采用双杠杆操作性程序,按串联时间表提供食物强化物。在辨别准确率达到80%后,对尼古丁拮抗剂美加明(0.03 - 1.0毫克/千克皮下注射)和苯二氮䓬拮抗剂氟马西尼(0.32 - 10毫克/千克腹腔注射)对尼古丁加咪达唑仑混合物的反应进行测试。单独给予美加明或氟马西尼的拮抗作用在接受“与或”程序训练的大鼠中比在接受“与”辨别训练的大鼠中更明显。同样,美加明加氟马西尼混合物的拮抗作用在“与或”程序下比在“与”辨别程序下更强效。与“与”辨别相比,“与或”方法使产生完全阻断所需的拮抗剂混合物剂量降低了约10倍。这些对拮抗剂敏感性的显著差异支持了这样一种观点,即“与或”或相关程序可能会增强复杂药物辨别中的药理特异性。