Chandler C J, Stolerman I P
Section of Behavioural Pharmacology, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1997 Feb;129(3):257-64. doi: 10.1007/s002130050188.
Cytisine binds with high affinity and specificity to neuronal nicotinic receptors but its physiological and behavioural effects are complex and differ from those of nicotine. The present study explores the behavioural aspects further by comparing the discriminative stimulus effects of cystisine with those of nicotine. Two groups of rats were trained to discriminate cytisine (2 mg/kg s.c.) or nicotine (0.2 mg/kg s.c.) from saline in a two-lever operant conditioning procedure with food reinforcers presented on a tandem VI FR schedule. A third group of rats was trained to discriminate cytisine (3 mg/kg s.c.). Rats acquired these discriminations within 50 training sessions. The stimulus effects of both cytisine and nicotine appeared within 4 min of s.c. injection. In generalization tests, rats trained with either cytisine or nicotine showed steep dose-response curves (generalization gradients) for their respective training drug. However, rats trained with cytisine showed full dose-related, generalization to nicotine (93%), whereas rats trained with nicotine exhibited only partial generalization to cytisine (54%). Rats trained with either cytisine or nicotine exhibited similar, partial generalization (76-77%) to (+)-amphetamine. The nicotine antagonist mecamylamine blocked the discriminative stimulus effects of both cytisine and nicotine; it was confirmed that the block of nicotine (0.2 mg/kg) was complete, whereas the block of cytisine (2 and 3 mg/kg) was incomplete in two separate experiments. Overall, the results showed that cytisine, like nicotine, can serve as a robust discriminative stimulus but, in contrast to its relatively high affinity in binding experiments, cytisine was much less potent than nicotine in the behavioural studies. Although the stimulus effects of the two drugs were very similar, there were some subtle differences such as the asymmetrical cross-generalizations between them and possible small differences in susceptibility to antagonism by mecamylamine. These effects were interpreted either in terms of a putative partial agonist effect of cytisine, or by assuming that nicotine produces a compound stimulus. Such a stimulus would be mediated through two or more subtypes of nicotinic receptor, and cytisine would act at some, but not all, of these receptor subtypes.
金雀花碱与神经元烟碱型受体具有高亲和力和特异性结合,但它的生理和行为效应较为复杂,与尼古丁的效应不同。本研究通过比较金雀花碱和尼古丁的辨别刺激效应,进一步探索其行为学方面。两组大鼠在双杠杆操作条件反射程序中接受训练,以辨别金雀花碱(2毫克/千克,皮下注射)或尼古丁(0.2毫克/千克,皮下注射)与生理盐水,食物强化物按串联可变间隔固定比率时间表呈现。第三组大鼠接受训练以辨别金雀花碱(3毫克/千克,皮下注射)。大鼠在50次训练内获得了这些辨别能力。金雀花碱和尼古丁的刺激效应在皮下注射后4分钟内出现。在泛化测试中,用金雀花碱或尼古丁训练的大鼠对各自的训练药物表现出陡峭的剂量反应曲线(泛化梯度)。然而,用金雀花碱训练的大鼠对尼古丁表现出完全的剂量相关泛化(93%),而用尼古丁训练的大鼠对金雀花碱仅表现出部分泛化(54%)。用金雀花碱或尼古丁训练的大鼠对(+)-苯丙胺表现出相似的部分泛化(76 - 77%)。尼古丁拮抗剂美加明阻断了金雀花碱和尼古丁的辨别刺激效应;在两个独立实验中证实,美加明对尼古丁(0.2毫克/千克)的阻断是完全的,而对金雀花碱(2和3毫克/千克)的阻断是不完全的。总体而言,结果表明,金雀花碱与尼古丁一样,可以作为一种强大的辨别刺激,但与它在结合实验中相对较高的亲和力相反,在行为学研究中,金雀花碱的效力远低于尼古丁。尽管两种药物的刺激效应非常相似,但仍存在一些细微差异,如它们之间的不对称交叉泛化以及对美加明拮抗作用的敏感性可能存在小差异。这些效应要么根据金雀花碱假定的部分激动剂效应来解释,要么通过假设尼古丁产生复合刺激来解释。这样的刺激将通过两种或更多种烟碱型受体亚型介导,而金雀花碱将作用于其中一些但不是所有的受体亚型。