Müller W A
Zoological Institute, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Int J Dev Biol. 1996 Dec;40(6):1133-9.
The decision head versus foot in a regenerating fragment of Hydra has been proposed to result from long-range competition for resources such as head-specific precursor cells and hormonal factors, with the winning end of the body column forming the head and the losing end forming the foot. The present study presents new experimental support for this hypothesis. Chimeras prepared from two strains of Hydra magnipapillata with high and low capacity for head regeneration reveal that the low capacity of reg-16 to regenerate a head resides in a low ability to recruit head-promoting resources. When confronted with competing wt105 tissue taken from the same body region, reg-16 tissue is caused to form feet while wt105 is enabled to from enlarged heads which sometimes split into two. Triplet chimeras prepared with labeled donor animals and two competing unlabeled recipients indicate that head-forming wt105 tissue incorporates migrating cells more effectively then head-forming reg-16 tissue.
水螅再生片段中头部与足部的决定被认为是由于对头部特异性前体细胞和激素因子等资源的远程竞争导致的,身体柱的获胜端形成头部,失败端形成足部。本研究为这一假说提供了新的实验支持。由两株头部再生能力高低不同的巨型乳头水螅制备的嵌合体表明,reg - 16再生头部能力低在于招募促进头部形成资源的能力低。当与取自同一身体区域的竞争性wt105组织相遇时,reg - 16组织会形成足部,而wt105则能够形成有时会分裂成两个的 enlarged heads(此处可能有误,原文是否为“enlarged heads”,疑为“large heads”,暂按原文翻译)。用标记的供体动物和两个竞争性未标记受体制备的三联体嵌合体表明,形成头部的wt105组织比形成头部的reg - 16组织更有效地整合迁移细胞。