Suppr超能文献

Ability of various inserts to promote endothelium cell culture for the establishment of coculture models.

作者信息

Villars F, Conrad V, Rouais F, Lefebvre F, Amédée J, Bordenave L

机构信息

INSERM U. 443, Université de Bordeaux II, France.

出版信息

Cell Biol Toxicol. 1996 Dec;12(4-6):207-14. doi: 10.1007/BF00438147.

Abstract

To select an insert suitable for human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) culture, we compared several available inserts of 0.2 to 0.45 micron porosity: Cellagen (ICN), Transwell-COL (Costar), Millicell-HA and CM (Millipore), Anopore (Nunc), Cyclopore (Falcon) in comparison with a control surface (Thermanox). The requirements were: (i) to promote attachment, adhesion and proliferation of HUVEC (judged by [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA at days 1, 3, 7); (ii) to allow HUVEC visualization by inverted, fluorescence microscopy for uptake of DiI-Ac-LDL and scanning electron microscopy, performed at day 9 after seeding. Because Transwell and Cellagen are collagen precoated and CM has to be coated for cell culture, we performed collagen coating (types I + III or IV) for non-pretreated inserts for the purpose of comparison. Our preferences comprise Transwell-COL, Cyclopore not coated or coated (whatever the collagen type), and Cellagen. However, on a quality/price ratio criterion, Cyclopore, even uncoated, is the insert of choice. The HA, CM and Anopore inserts, even coated, do not allow HUVEC growth but do not alter positive uptake of acetylated LDL.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验