Nielsen P E, Kirchner P T, Gerber F H
J Nucl Med. 1977 Oct;18(10):967-72.
Over 300 perfusion lung scans were reviewed to assess the clinical utility of routinely performed anterior and posterior oblique projections. The characteristics of normal anterior and posterior oblique views were analyzed and compared with lateral projections. The four oblique images contributed materially toward characterization of perfusion defects in 63% of all abnormal studies; the contribution of posterior obliques was 48%, anterior obliques, 15%. For scans displaying at least one focal defect, oblique views were of benefit in over 70% of cases, with posterior obliques accounting for 55%. Oblique views contributed little when perfusion abnormalities involved both lung fields diffusely. The posterior oblique projection was of more value than the anterior oblique because of its ability to clarify lower-lobe abnormalities significantly. A scanning artifact in the posterior oblique views, due to attenuation of the near lung activity by scapula and shoulder-girdle musculature, was seen in 90% of normal studies.
回顾了300多例灌注肺扫描,以评估常规进行的前后斜位投照的临床实用性。分析了正常前后斜位视图的特征,并与侧位投照进行了比较。在所有异常研究中,四张斜位图像对63%的灌注缺损特征性显示有重要作用;后斜位的贡献为48%,前斜位为15%。对于显示至少一个局灶性缺损的扫描,斜位视图在超过70%的病例中有益,其中后斜位占55%。当灌注异常弥漫性累及双肺野时,斜位视图作用不大。后斜位投照比前斜位更有价值,因为它能够显著澄清下叶异常。在90%的正常研究中,可以看到后斜位视图中存在扫描伪影,这是由于肩胛骨和肩胛带肌肉组织对近肺活动的衰减所致。