McLaughlin T J, Soumerai S B, Willison D J, Gurwitz J H, Gao X, Borbas C, Gobel F
Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Jan;12(1):1-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.12105.x.
Growing evidence indicates that life-sustaining therapies for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are underused among patients eligible for therapy, including the elderly and women. We examined the effect of a patient's comorbidity burden on use of these highly effective therapies in eligible populations of individuals with AMI.
Retrospective cohort design.
We reviewed the medical records of 2,409 individuals at 37 Minnesota hospitals from October 1992 through July 1993 with an admission diagnosis of AMI, suspected AMI, or rule-out AMI, who met electrocardiographic, laboratory, and clinical criteria for AMI.
Using multivariate logistic regression models, we determined the association between a validated comorbidity measure and the proportion of eligible patients who received thrombolysis or aspirin. Controlling for other factors previously reported to influence rates of study treatment, the odds of receipt of thrombolysis among patients with severe comorbidity was 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27, 0.88) when compared with individuals without such limitation. Similarly, the odds of aspirin treatment among study patients with severe comorbidity was 0.46 (95% CI 0.30 0.72), compared with individuals without severe comorbidity. We did not distinguish any differences in patterns of treatment with either study treatment among patients with mild or moderate comorbidity when compared with individuals without any concomitant comorbidity.
This study indicates that patients with severe mental and physical comorbidities are less likely to receive standard therapies for AMI recommended in national treatment guidelines.
越来越多的证据表明,在符合治疗条件的患者中,包括老年人和女性,用于治疗急性心肌梗死(AMI)的维持生命疗法未得到充分利用。我们研究了患者的合并症负担对AMI合格人群中这些高效疗法使用情况的影响。
回顾性队列研究设计。
我们回顾了1992年10月至1993年7月期间明尼苏达州37家医院的2409名患者的病历,这些患者入院诊断为AMI、疑似AMI或排除AMI,且符合AMI的心电图、实验室和临床标准。
使用多变量逻辑回归模型,我们确定了一种经过验证的合并症测量方法与接受溶栓或阿司匹林治疗的合格患者比例之间的关联。在控制先前报道的影响研究治疗率的其他因素后,与没有此类限制的个体相比,严重合并症患者接受溶栓治疗的几率为0.49(95%置信区间[CI]0.27,0.88)。同样,与没有严重合并症的个体相比,严重合并症研究患者接受阿司匹林治疗的几率为0.46(95%CI 0.30,0.72)。与没有任何合并症的个体相比,我们没有发现轻度或中度合并症患者在使用任何一种研究治疗方法时的治疗模式有任何差异。
本研究表明,患有严重身心合并症的患者不太可能接受国家治疗指南中推荐的AMI标准疗法。