Suppr超能文献

一项关于髋关节骨关节炎药物治疗的随机对照试验的系统评价。

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological therapy in osteoarthritis of the hip.

作者信息

Towheed T E, Hochberg M C

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 1997 Feb;24(2):349-57.

PMID:9034996
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review all randomized controlled trials (RCT) of pharmacological therapy in osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip. To determine which nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) is the most effective, and which NSAID is the most toxic.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was used to identify RCT of pharmacological therapy in patients with OA of the hip published between 1966 and August 1994. Qualitative assessments were performed using a quality scoring system designed for NSAID trials in rheumatoid arthritis. Both the design and analysis aspects of the trials were evaluated, each aspect rated on a scale of 0 to 8. A quantitative method, which calculates the ratio of improvement produced by one NSAID to that produced by another, was used to rate the relative efficacy of different NSAID with respect to pain relief. Toxicity comparisons were made according to the authors' findings.

RESULTS

43 RCT were identified, and of these, 39 evaluated NSAID while 4 evaluated only analgesics. The median design and analysis scores were 2 and 4, respectively, 6 NSAID were included in at least 5 trials; of these, indomethacin was rated more effective in 5 of its 7 comparisons, but more toxic in 7 of 12 comparisons. Only 5 of the 29 (17%) NSAID comparisons found statistically significant differences in efficacy.

CONCLUSION

NSAID trials in patients with OA of the hip appear to be weakened by the lack of standardization of case definition of OA, and also by the lack of standardization of outcome assessments. No recommendations for the choice of specific NSAID therapy in hip OA can be offered based on this analysis.

摘要

目的

系统回顾所有关于髋关节骨关节炎(OA)药物治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。确定哪种非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)最有效,哪种NSAID毒性最大。

方法

利用MEDLINE检索1966年至1994年8月发表的关于髋关节OA患者药物治疗的RCT。使用为类风湿关节炎NSAID试验设计的质量评分系统进行定性评估。对试验的设计和分析方面均进行评估,每个方面按0至8分进行评分。采用一种定量方法来评估不同NSAID在缓解疼痛方面的相对疗效,该方法计算一种NSAID产生的改善与另一种NSAID产生的改善之比。根据作者的研究结果进行毒性比较。

结果

共识别出43项RCT,其中39项评估了NSAID,4项仅评估了镇痛药。设计和分析评分的中位数分别为2分和4分。至少5项试验纳入了6种NSAID;其中,吲哚美辛在其7项比较中的5项中被评为更有效,但在12项比较中的7项中毒性更大。29项NSAID比较中只有5项(17%)在疗效上发现有统计学显著差异。

结论

髋关节OA患者的NSAID试验似乎因OA病例定义缺乏标准化以及结局评估缺乏标准化而受到削弱。基于该分析,无法为髋关节OA的特定NSAID治疗选择提供建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验