Kolettis T M, Saksena S, Mathew P, Krol R B, Giorgberidze I, Bhambhani G
Arrhythmia & Pacemaker Service, Eastern Heart Institute, Passaic, New Jersey, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Feb 1;79(3):323-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00755-2.
Several factors may influence hemodynamic tolerance of a ventricular tachycardia (VT) episode but, to date, only VT rate has been used as a major detection criterion in selecting implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy algorithms. We examined hemodynamic changes during VT in humans and a possible correlation between left and right ventricular hemodynamic indexes. Right ventricular hemodynamic indexes could reflect systemic hemodynamics but previous studies have been inconclusive. Patients with coronary artery disease and a history of recurrent, sustained VT were studied. Aortic pressure and right and left ventricular pressures were simultaneously recorded with 2 dual micromanometer-tipped high-fidelity pressure catheters during sinus rhythm and during induced sustained monomorphic VT. Beat-to-beat analysis was performed using custom-made software. Nine patients (7 men, mean age 60 +/- 8 years, mean ejection fraction 24 +/- 8%) with 11 VT episodes (mean cycle length 283 +/- 48 ms) were studied. During VT, left and right ventricular systolic pressures showed a mean decrease of 57% and 26%, respectively, with weak correlation (r = 0.67, p = 0.06) between both values. There was also an increase in mean left and right ventricular end-diastolic pressures of 26% and 74%, respectively, and no correlation was seen (r = -0.2, p = 0.6). A significant correlation was found between changes in left and right ventricular maximal positive dP/dt (55% and 28% decrease, respectively (r = 0.69, p = 0.03) and between changes in left and right ventricular maximal negative dP/dt (64% vs 39% decrease, r = 0.71, p = 0.02). Most ventricular time parameters in both ventricles differed significantly during VT compared with sinus rhythm; however, only the decrease in right ventricular time to end-diastolic pressure correlated with the decrease in left ventricular systolic pressure, at the 10th VT beat (r = 0.8, p = 0.01). We conclude that left and right ventricles are hemodynamically unequally affected during rapid VT. Although right ventricular pressures cannot be reliably used to assess changes in the hemodynamic status of the left ventricle, additional parameters, such as dP/dt or changes in ventricular time intervals, should be further evaluated for inclusion in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator algorithms.
多种因素可能影响室性心动过速(VT)发作时的血流动力学耐受性,但迄今为止,在选择植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗算法时,仅室性心动过速的速率被用作主要检测标准。我们研究了人体室性心动过速期间的血流动力学变化以及左右心室血流动力学指标之间的可能相关性。右心室血流动力学指标可以反映全身血流动力学,但先前的研究尚无定论。对患有冠状动脉疾病且有复发性持续性室性心动过速病史的患者进行了研究。在窦性心律和诱发的持续性单形性室性心动过速期间,使用2根双微测压头高保真压力导管同时记录主动脉压力以及左右心室压力。使用定制软件进行逐搏分析。研究了9例患者(7名男性,平均年龄60±8岁,平均射血分数24±8%),共发作11次室性心动过速(平均周期长度283±48毫秒)。在室性心动过速期间,左心室和右心室收缩压平均分别下降57%和26%,两者之间的相关性较弱(r = 0.67,p = 0.06)。左心室和右心室舒张末期平均压力也分别升高了26%和74%,且未见相关性(r = -0.2,p = 0.6)。发现左右心室最大正dP/dt的变化之间存在显著相关性(分别下降55%和28%,r = 0.69,p = 0.03),左右心室最大负dP/dt的变化之间也存在显著相关性(分别下降64%和39%,r = 0.71,p = 0.02)。与窦性心律相比,室性心动过速期间两个心室的大多数心室时间参数均有显著差异;然而,仅右心室舒张末期压力时间的下降与第10次室性心动过速搏动时左心室收缩压的下降相关(r = 0.8,p = 0.01)。我们得出结论,在快速室性心动过速期间,左右心室在血流动力学上受到的影响不相等。尽管右心室压力不能可靠地用于评估左心室血流动力学状态的变化,但对于纳入植入式心脏复律除颤器算法,应进一步评估诸如dP/dt或心室时间间隔变化等其他参数。