Baumann I, Swindell R, Van Hoeff M E, Dexter T M, de Wynter E, Lange C, Luft T, Howell A, Testa N G
Department of Experimental Haematology, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester, UK.
Ann Oncol. 1996 Dec;7(10):1051-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010498.
The objective of this study was to determine the optimal conditions for blood progenitor cell harvest for transplantation, with main emphasis on the mobilisation kinetics of primitive, marrow repopulating cells.
Sixteen patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with 4 cycles of dose escalating FAC chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide) each followed by 10 micrograms/kg/d G-CSF for 13 days. We assessed the number of colony-forming cells (CFC), and estimated the long-term culture initiating cells (LTC-IC) and CD34+ cells during the recovery phase of cycle 1 and 4 of chemotherapy, and during additional periods of G-CSF administration either preceding or following the full course of chemotherapy.
The highest peak numbers of CFC per ml of blood (median 10489, range 860-39282) were mobilised after the first cycle of chemotherapy. The lowest peak numbers of CFC were obtained during the recovery phase from cycle 4 (median 4739, range 40-26789). In contrast, the numbers of CD34+ cells per ml of blood were significantly higher in cycle 4 (median 650, range 30-2600 x 10(2)) compared to those of cycle 1 (median 240, range 20-770 x 10(2)). The peak numbers of CFC mobilised by G-CSF before commencement and after the cessation of chemotherapy were equivalent, with a median of 5470 (range 1056-25669) and 5948 (range 2710-38975) per ml of blood, respectively. However, while mononuclear cells (MNC) collected at the days of maximal CFC mobilization following G-CSF administration before or after cycle 1 were similar to normal bone marrow MNCs in their ability to generate haemopoiesis when seeded onto performed irradiated stroma, those collected after cycle 4 or during G-CSF administration after the cessation of chemotherapy were markedly compromised in this respect.
Our results indicate that repeated cycles of FAC chemotherapy followed by G-CSF result in a far lower number of LTC-IC than of CFC mobilised into the circulation. Furthermore although the combination of chemotherapy and G-CSF mobilised the highest numbers if CFC, G-CSF alone pre-chemotherapy was more effective at mobilising LTC-IC. These data indicate that neither the numbers of CFC mobilised nor the numbers of CD34+ cells are necessarily a reliable indicator for the putative marrow repopulating capability of the blood cells mobilised with chemotherapy plus G-CSF.
本研究的目的是确定用于移植的血液祖细胞采集的最佳条件,主要关注原始骨髓重建细胞的动员动力学。
16例晚期乳腺癌患者接受4个周期的剂量递增FAC化疗(5-氟尿嘧啶、阿霉素、环磷酰胺),每个周期后给予10微克/千克/天的粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF),共13天。我们评估了集落形成细胞(CFC)的数量,并估计了化疗第1周期和第4周期恢复阶段以及化疗全程之前或之后额外的G-CSF给药期间的长期培养起始细胞(LTC-IC)和CD34+细胞数量。
化疗第1周期后,每毫升血液中CFC的最高峰值数量(中位数10489,范围860 - 39282)被动员出来。CFC的最低峰值数量出现在第4周期的恢复阶段(中位数4739,范围40 - 26789)。相比之下,第4周期每毫升血液中的CD34+细胞数量(中位数650,范围30 - 2600×10²)显著高于第1周期(中位数240,范围20 - 770×10²)。化疗开始前和结束后G-CSF动员的CFC峰值数量相当,每毫升血液中中位数分别为5470(范围1056 - 25669)和5948(范围2710 - 38975)。然而,虽然在第1周期之前或之后G-CSF给药后CFC动员达到最大值的日子采集的单个核细胞(MNC),接种到预先照射的基质上时在产生造血作用的能力方面与正常骨髓MNC相似,但在第4周期后或化疗停止后G-CSF给药期间采集的MNC在这方面明显受损。
我们的结果表明,重复的FAC化疗周期后给予G-CSF导致动员到循环中的长期培养起始细胞数量远低于集落形成细胞数量。此外,尽管化疗和G-CSF联合动员的CFC数量最多,但化疗前单独使用G-CSF在动员长期培养起始细胞方面更有效。这些数据表明,无论是动员的CFC数量还是CD34+细胞数量都不一定是化疗加G-CSF动员的血细胞假定骨髓重建能力的可靠指标。