Jehl C, Royet J P, Holley A
Université Claude-Bernard, Laboratoire de Physiologie Neurosensorielle, Villeurbanne, France.
Percept Psychophys. 1997 Jan;59(1):100-10. doi: 10.3758/bf03206852.
The role of verbal encoding in odor recognition memory was investigated using odors of low familiarity to subjects before the experiment began. The experimental procedure included two phases--odor learning (first phase) and odor memory testing (second phase)--separated by a delay of 7 days. Five experimental conditions were established: three conditions of odor learning with names (labeling conditions), one condition of odor learning without names (sensory familiarization), and one condition of no learning prior to testing (control conditions). The labeling conditions differed from each other regarding label characteristics. The names were those of odor sources (veridical names), those personally generated by subjects (generated names), or those derived from the chemical names of the odorants (chemical names). Subjects were required to learn 20 fixed associations between odors (targets or distractors) and 20 names during two daily sessions. The learning sessions included two identification tests and ended by a verbal memory test in which subjects recalled odor names. The odor memory test was split into two parts separated by a retention interval of either 20 min (short-term memory) or 24 h (long-term memory). Data showed that olfactory recognition memory was enhanced in subjects who associated veridical or generated names to odors during the learning session. Chemical names were not appropriate to facilitate odor recognition. Similarly, the level of odor identification was higher for veridical and generated names than for chemical names, though the level of verbal memory for chemical names was substantial. Recognition response latencies were systematically longer for a target odor implying a positive response than for a distractor odor implying a negative response. Together, these data suggest that odor recognition and identification are sensitive to the semantic content of labels associated with odors. Odor memory was adversively influenced by time, but this influence was less pronounced when the names were endowed with a rich semantic content.
在实验开始前,使用受试者不太熟悉的气味来研究言语编码在气味识别记忆中的作用。实验程序包括两个阶段——气味学习(第一阶段)和气味记忆测试(第二阶段),中间间隔7天。建立了五种实验条件:三种使用名称进行气味学习的条件(标记条件)、一种不使用名称进行气味学习的条件(感官熟悉)和一种在测试前不进行学习的条件(对照条件)。标记条件在标签特征方面彼此不同。这些名称是气味来源的名称(真实名称)、受试者自己生成的名称(生成名称)或源自气味剂化学名称的名称(化学名称)。受试者需要在每天的两个时段中学习20种气味(目标或干扰物)与20个名称之间的固定关联。学习时段包括两次识别测试,并以言语记忆测试结束,受试者在该测试中回忆气味名称。气味记忆测试分为两部分,中间间隔20分钟(短期记忆)或24小时(长期记忆)。数据表明,在学习时段将真实名称或生成名称与气味相关联的受试者的嗅觉识别记忆得到增强。化学名称不利于促进气味识别。同样,真实名称和生成名称的气味识别水平高于化学名称,尽管化学名称的言语记忆水平较高。对于暗示阳性反应的目标气味,识别反应潜伏期系统地长于暗示阴性反应的干扰物气味。总之,这些数据表明,气味识别和鉴定对与气味相关联的标签的语义内容敏感。气味记忆受到时间的不利影响,但当名称具有丰富的语义内容时,这种影响不太明显。