Hartley J A, Preti C S, Wyatt M D, Lee M
Department of Chemistry, Furman University, Greenville, SC 29613, USA.
Drug Des Discov. 1995 Apr;12(4):323-35.
The synthesis, DNA binding and biological evaluation of two benzoic acid mustard derivatives of imidazole-containing analogues of distamycin in which the C-terminus is modified to contain a terminal carboxamide are described. The apparent DNA binding constants of compounds 5 and 6 were determined using an ethidium displacement assay, and the results showed that they do not have the AT sequence selectivity of distamycin and they show an acceptance for GC base pairs. Based on their pronounced binding to T4 DNA the data suggest that they bind to the minor groove of DNA. The cytotoxicities of compounds 5 and 6 in human chronic myeloid leukemia cells were determined using a MTT assay, and their IC50 values were 27 and 16 microM, respectively, and higher than the corresponding non-terminal carboxamide-containing analogues 3 and 4. Both compounds were however markedly more active than the non-targeted mustard BAM [N,N-bis (-2-chloroethyl)-4-aminobenzoic acid]. In the NCI panel of cell lines 5 gave a distinctly different pattern of tumor selectivity from 6. While these compounds were shown to alkylate DNA using a CD alkylation assay (35 +/- 10% for 5 and 85 +/- 10% for 6), they produced interstrand crosslinks poorly, even at 100 microM drug concentrations. Based on preliminary data from a polymerase stop assay compounds 3-6 gave different patterns of sequence selection monoalkylation which may contribute to their differing biological activities.
本文描述了两种双氢链霉素含咪唑类似物的苯甲酸氮芥衍生物的合成、DNA结合及生物学评价,其中C端经修饰含有末端羧酰胺。采用溴化乙锭置换法测定了化合物5和6的表观DNA结合常数,结果表明它们不具有双氢链霉素对AT序列的选择性,而是对GC碱基对具有亲和性。基于它们与T4 DNA的显著结合,数据表明它们与DNA的小沟结合。采用MTT法测定了化合物5和6对人慢性髓性白血病细胞的细胞毒性,其IC50值分别为27和16 μM,高于相应的不含末端羧酰胺的类似物3和4。然而,这两种化合物均比非靶向氮芥BAM [N,N-双(-2-氯乙基)-4-氨基苯甲酸]活性明显更高。在NCI细胞系面板中,化合物5与6表现出明显不同的肿瘤选择性模式。虽然采用CD烷基化试验表明这些化合物可使DNA烷基化(化合物5为35±10%,化合物6为85±10%),但即使在100 μM药物浓度下,它们产生链间交联的能力也很差。基于聚合酶终止试验的初步数据,化合物3 - 6产生了不同模式的序列选择单烷基化,这可能导致它们具有不同的生物学活性。