Suppr超能文献

哮喘患者急诊科依赖相关因素。

Factors associated with emergency department dependence of patients with asthma.

作者信息

Hanania N A, David-Wang A, Kesten S, Chapman K R

机构信息

Asthma Centre, Toronto Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Chest. 1997 Feb;111(2):290-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.111.2.290.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dependence on crisis-oriented care rather than continuous ambulatory care for asthma is thought to contribute to asthma morbidity and mortality. We contrasted the characteristics of patients who depend on emergency department (ED) care for the management of their asthma exacerbations to the characteristics of patients employing self-management plans in an ambulatory setting.

METHODS

In prospective fashion, we used a structured interview and charted information to survey two cohorts of patients suffering from an acute exacerbation of asthma; those seen in a hospital ED (n = 80) and those seen in an ambulatory asthma care facility (Asthma Center [AC]) (n = 40) at the same hospital. We looked for differences in socioeconomic characteristics, asthma severity, asthma knowledge, and asthma self-management skills between groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in mean age (SD) (ED vs AC: 36.65 [13.8] vs 40 [13.8] years) or female to male ratio (ED vs AC: 2/1 vs 2.5/1) between the two groups. There were no major differences in ethnic origin, educational status, marital status, smoking history, employment status, number of children in the household, possession of an extended health insurance plan, sick leave benefits, and child care availability between the two groups. Patients seeking ED care were more likely to have resided in the city for < 5 years (34% vs 8%; p < 0.05), and more likely to be living alone (35% vs 15%; p < 0.05). Significantly more patients from the ED group had a below average gross annual income (55% vs 3%; p < 0.05). There were several significant differences between groups in their knowledge of asthma and its therapy. Most striking, 79% of AC patients reported having a predetermined crisis plan vs just 23% of ED patients (p < 0.001). Although measurements of airflow (percent predicted FEV1) were significantly lower in the ED group than the AC group (mean, 50% vs 78.4%; p < 0.001), other indexes reflecting the degree of asthma severity over the long term such as past use of oral steroids, history of hospitalization, or ICU admission for asthma and the mean total days of disability within the preceding year were not significantly different between the two groups. Most of the ED patients had more than one previous visit to the ED for asthma exacerbation within the preceding year while most exacerbations of AC patients had been treated in the ambulatory care setting. Only 17% of ED patients initiated or increased inhaled or oral steroids before seeking medical care vs 89% of AC patients (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that a subgroup of asthmatics depends primarily on crisis-oriented care for the management of asthma. These patients are more likely to have lower income, to live alone, and to have resided at their current address for less time than patients seeking less urgent ambulatory care. Moreover, such patients are less knowledgeable about asthma and its management and are less likely to have a predetermined crisis plan.

摘要

背景

人们认为,依赖以危机为导向的护理而非哮喘的持续门诊护理会导致哮喘的发病率和死亡率上升。我们将依赖急诊科(ED)护理来管理哮喘急性发作的患者特征与在门诊环境中采用自我管理计划的患者特征进行了对比。

方法

我们以前瞻性方式,通过结构化访谈和图表信息对两组哮喘急性发作患者进行了调查;一组是在医院急诊科就诊的患者(n = 80),另一组是在同一家医院的门诊哮喘护理机构(哮喘中心[AC])就诊的患者(n = 40)。我们研究了两组患者在社会经济特征、哮喘严重程度、哮喘知识和哮喘自我管理技能方面的差异。

结果

两组患者的平均年龄(标准差)(急诊科与哮喘中心:36.65 [13.8]岁 vs 40 [13.8]岁)或男女比例(急诊科与哮喘中心:2/1 vs 2.5/1)无显著差异。两组在种族、教育程度、婚姻状况、吸烟史、就业状况、家庭子女数量、是否拥有扩展健康保险计划、病假福利和儿童保育可及性方面无重大差异。寻求急诊科护理的患者更有可能在该市居住不到5年(34% vs 8%;p < 0.05),且更有可能独居(35% vs 15%;p < 0.05)。急诊科组年收入低于平均水平的患者明显更多(55% vs 3%;p < 0.05)。两组患者在哮喘及其治疗知识方面存在若干显著差异。最显著的是,79%的哮喘中心患者报告有预先制定的危机计划,而急诊科患者中只有23%(p < 0.001)。尽管急诊科组的气流测量值(预测FEV1百分比)显著低于哮喘中心组(平均值,50% vs 78.4%;p < 0.001),但反映长期哮喘严重程度的其他指标,如过去口服类固醇的使用情况、住院史、因哮喘入住重症监护病房情况以及前一年的平均总残疾天数,两组之间无显著差异。大多数急诊科患者在前一年因哮喘急性发作不止一次前往急诊科就诊,而哮喘中心患者的大多数急性发作是在门诊护理环境中治疗的。只有17%的急诊科患者在寻求医疗护理前开始或增加吸入或口服类固醇药物治疗,而哮喘中心患者的这一比例为89%(p < 0.001)。

结论

我们得出结论,一部分哮喘患者主要依赖以危机为导向的护理来管理哮喘。与寻求不那么紧急的门诊护理的患者相比,这些患者更有可能收入较低、独居且在当前住址居住时间较短。此外,这类患者对哮喘及其管理的了解较少,且不太可能有预先制定的危机计划。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验