Gleason D M, Bottaccini M R, McRae L P
Urodynamics Laboratory, Tucson Medical Center, Arizona 85712, USA.
Neurourol Urodyn. 1997;16(2):93-100. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(1997)16:2<93::aid-nau2>3.0.co;2-8.
A group of 26 patients was tested for isovolumetric pressure and optimal flow rate by means of the cuff-uroflow (CUF) technique. The same patients were also examined in the clinic, and a diagnosis was recorded. The two processes were performed independently in a statistically double-blind manner. Standard statistical comparisons were made, and it was shown that there exists substantial correlation between the results of clinical examination and the cuff-uroflow procedure. It was also shown that the CUF technique converged more rapidly to a correct diagnosis than standard clinical procedures. Surgical treatment and watchful waiting were examined and it was shown, as expected, that surgical treatment resulted in substantial improvement in most cases, but that watchful waiting generated no statistically significant change.
一组26名患者通过袖带尿流率(CUF)技术进行等容压力和最佳流速测试。同样这些患者也在诊所接受了检查,并记录了诊断结果。这两个过程以统计学双盲方式独立进行。进行了标准的统计学比较,结果表明临床检查结果与袖带尿流率检查之间存在显著相关性。还表明,与标准临床程序相比,CUF技术能更快地得出正确诊断。对手术治疗和观察等待进行了研究,不出所料,结果表明手术治疗在大多数情况下能带来显著改善,但观察等待未产生统计学上的显著变化。