Mann S G, Cottrell J, Murakami A, Stauffer L, Rao A N
Clinical Research and Development Group, J & J MSD Europe, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Feb;11(1):121-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.113284000.x.
To establish whether patients taking famotidine 10 mg to treat an episode of heartburn were protected from a recurrence of symptoms after a subsequent test meal.
Frequent heartburn sufferers (n = 366) were randomized to receive double blind treatment with famotidine 10 mg or 2 x 250 mg chewable alginate tablets within 30 min of a spontaneous episode of heartburn. After 4 h, patients with no or slight residual symptoms consumed a meal likely to induce heartburn. Over the next 4 h patients recorded the severity of heartburn and any consumption of 'rescue' antacids. At the end of this time they rated the global efficacy of their treatment in controlling meal-induced symptoms.
Study groups were well matched for all baseline characteristics. Of the 366 randomized patients, 276 took study medication and data from 269 patients (132 famotidine, 137 alginate) were analysed for efficacy. Compared to the alginate control group famotidine treated patients reported better global efficacy following the test meal (P < 0.001; relative odds for a more favourable response: 2.26 [95% CI: 1.45-3.53]). Fewer patients receiving famotidine resorted to antacid rescue (P = 0.038; relative odds for a more favourable response: 2.24 [95% CI: 1.04-4.79]) and peak heartburn was significantly less severe with famotidine treatment (P < 0.001: relative odds for a more favourable response: 2.90 [95% CI: 1.85-4.53]). Eleven famotidine-treated patients (8%) and 13 alginate patients (9%) reported adverse events.
Compared to patients receiving an alginate preparation, patients self medicating with famotidine 10 mg for heartburn are better protected against a recurrence of their symptoms when they next eat. This suggests that the duration of acid control (9 h) previously demonstrated with this dose translates into a similar duration of measurable symptom control during the day.
确定服用10毫克法莫替丁治疗烧心发作的患者在随后的试餐后是否能预防症状复发。
经常烧心的患者(n = 366)在烧心自发发作后30分钟内被随机分配接受10毫克法莫替丁或2片250毫克咀嚼型海藻酸盐片的双盲治疗。4小时后,没有或仅有轻微残余症状的患者进食一顿可能诱发烧心的餐食。在接下来的4小时内,患者记录烧心的严重程度以及任何“急救”抗酸剂的服用情况。在这段时间结束时,他们对治疗控制餐食诱发症状的总体疗效进行评分。
研究组在所有基线特征方面匹配良好。在366名随机分组的患者中,276名服用了研究药物,对269名患者(132名服用法莫替丁,137名服用海藻酸盐)的数据进行了疗效分析。与海藻酸盐对照组相比,服用法莫替丁的患者在试餐后报告的总体疗效更好(P < 0.001;更有利反应的相对比值:2.26 [95% CI:1.45 - 3.53])。服用法莫替丁的患者求助于抗酸剂急救的较少(P = 0.038;更有利反应的相对比值:2.24 [95% CI:1.04 - 4.79]),且法莫替丁治疗的烧心峰值明显较轻(P < 0.001:更有利反应的相对比值:2.90 [95% CI:1.85 - 4.53])。11名服用法莫替丁的患者(8%)和13名服用海藻酸盐的患者(9%)报告了不良事件。
与接受海藻酸盐制剂的患者相比,自行服用10毫克法莫替丁治疗烧心的患者在下次进食时能更好地预防症状复发。这表明先前该剂量所显示的胃酸控制持续时间(9小时)在白天转化为了类似的可测量症状控制持续时间。