Suppr超能文献

抗酸剂水滑石与法莫替丁和安慰剂按需治疗急性烧心的比较:随机双盲交叉研究

On-demand treatment of acute heartburn with the antacid hydrotalcite compared with famotidine and placebo: randomized double-blind cross-over study.

作者信息

Holtmeier Wolfgang, Holtmann Gerald, Caspary Wolfgang F, Weingärtner Ulrike

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Med. Klinik I, J.W. Goethe Universität, Frankfurt, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007 Jul;41(6):564-70. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31802e7efb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antacids are widely used in the self-treatment of gastroesophageal reflux-induced complaints, but respective studies are lacking.

GOALS

To compare the efficacy and safety of hydrotalcite with the H2 receptor antagonist famotidine and placebo in the on-demand treatment of acute heartburn under daily practice conditions.

STUDY

Five hundred sixty-two individuals in 4 centers were randomized in a double-blind, double-dummy, 3-fold cross-over study to single-dose treatments of 1000 mg hydrotalcite, 10 mg famotidine, or placebo. Heartburn severity and relief was measured with numerical and visual rating scales.

RESULTS

A significantly better heartburn relief score was achieved 60 minutes after administration of hydrotalcite compared with placebo (primary end point, P<0.0001). Better efficacy was also observed 30 minutes and 3 hours after the intake of hydrotalcite in comparison with famotidine or placebo. A significant decrease in heartburn severity compared with placebo occurred within 10 minutes for hydrotalcite and was faster compared with both controls.

CONCLUSIONS

For subjects self-administering antacids for episodic heartburn, antacid hydrotalcite provides symptom relief significantly faster and, within the first 3 hours postdosing, more effective than famotidine or placebo. These results suggest that on-demand treatment of hydrotalcite is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for heartburn.

摘要

背景

抗酸剂广泛用于胃食管反流所致不适的自我治疗,但相关研究较少。

目的

在日常实践条件下,比较水滑石与H2受体拮抗剂法莫替丁及安慰剂按需治疗急性烧心的疗效和安全性。

研究

4个中心的562名受试者被随机纳入一项双盲、双模拟、三交叉研究,接受1000毫克水滑石、10毫克法莫替丁或安慰剂的单剂量治疗。采用数字评分量表和视觉模拟评分量表测量烧心的严重程度和缓解情况。

结果

与安慰剂相比,服用水滑石60分钟后烧心缓解评分显著更高(主要终点,P<0.0001)。与法莫替丁或安慰剂相比,服用水滑石30分钟和3小时后也观察到更好的疗效。与安慰剂相比,水滑石在10分钟内烧心严重程度显著降低,且比两个对照组都更快。

结论

对于自行服用抗酸剂治疗偶发性烧心的受试者,抗酸剂水滑石能显著更快地缓解症状,且在给药后的前3小时内比法莫替丁或安慰剂更有效。这些结果表明,水滑石按需治疗烧心是一种有效且耐受性良好的疗法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验